On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Christian Stimming writes:
>
>> Doesn't the src/engine/Period.[hc] code have anything to do with our
>> currently existing menu item "Tools" -> "Close Books"? If that menu
>> item indeed doesn't use that code (which surprises me somewhat), the
Christian Stimming writes:
> Doesn't the src/engine/Period.[hc] code have anything to do with our
> currently existing menu item "Tools" -> "Close Books"? If that menu
> item indeed doesn't use that code (which surprises me somewhat), the
> code can be removed. Checking further, the "Close Books"
Am Dienstag, 16. August 2011 schrieb John Ralls:
> On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:23 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > On zaterdag 13 augustus 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> >> Along a similar vein, there's src/engine/period.[ch] and the "gemini"
> >> structure which depends upon it. The idea there appears to be th
On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:23 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On zaterdag 13 augustus 2011, John Ralls wrote:
>> Along a similar vein, there's src/engine/period.[ch] and the "gemini"
>> structure which depends upon it. The idea there appears to be that when
>> one closes the books (in the accounting sens
On zaterdag 13 augustus 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> Along a similar vein, there's src/engine/period.[ch] and the "gemini"
> structure which depends upon it. The idea there appears to be that when
> one closes the books (in the accounting sense) at the end of a period, the
> book (in the Gnucash sense
On Aug 12, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2011 schrieb John Ralls:
>> On Aug 11, 2011, at 12:28 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>> Muslim discovered a couple of functions in QofSession.c,
>>> qof_instance_copy_coll_r and qof_instance_copy_one_r, along with a
>>> co
Hi,
John Ralls writes:
> Muslim discovered a couple of functions in QofSession.c,
> qof_instance_copy_coll_r and qof_instance_copy_one_r, along with a
> companion test src/engine/test/test-recursive.c which seems intended
> to support a hierarchy of books. Given the way we treat books, this
> se
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2011 schrieb John Ralls:
> On Aug 11, 2011, at 12:28 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> > Muslim discovered a couple of functions in QofSession.c,
> > qof_instance_copy_coll_r and qof_instance_copy_one_r, along with a
> > companion test src/engine/test/test-recursive.c which seems in
On Aug 11, 2011, at 12:28 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> Muslim discovered a couple of functions in QofSession.c,
> qof_instance_copy_coll_r and qof_instance_copy_one_r, along with a companion
> test src/engine/test/test-recursive.c which seems intended to support a
> hierarchy of books. Given the wa
Muslim discovered a couple of functions in QofSession.c,
qof_instance_copy_coll_r and qof_instance_copy_one_r, along with a companion
test src/engine/test/test-recursive.c which seems intended to support a
hierarchy of books. Given the way we treat books, this seems to me to be a
seriously dumb
10 matches
Mail list logo