On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 19:41 -0400, Andrew Duggan wrote:
Josh Sled wrote:
Oh, what're you thinking? I'm planning on re-writing most of the SX
stuff in the next month or two, so we might want to coordinate now,
before things diverge too much...
Basically I was thinking of checking
Josh Sled wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 19:41 -0400, Andrew Duggan wrote:
Josh Sled wrote:
Oh, what're you thinking? I'm planning on re-writing most of the SX
stuff in the next month or two, so we might want to coordinate now,
before things diverge too much...
Basically I was thinking of
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 16:56 -0400, Andrew Duggan wrote:
I think then I am on the right track, since that's what I did. Plus I've
just gotten it to work - at least through a couple of rounds of initial
testing :-) Now I can just look at the tool bar and see how many pending
txn/reminders
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 10:57 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
I guess the two biggest deprecated pieces in the SX ui right now are the
clists: a few in the SLR dialog and the one in the SX List.
GtkCList/GtkCTree is the big one.
Those are the biggest deprecated usages I'm aware of, but I'm not on top
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 17:47 -0400, Andrew Duggan wrote:
The reminders and to_create_list seem to be pretty easy to grasp, but
right now the best I can tell the dead list is maybe for those scheduled
txn that are past the repeats until point or past the specified lifetime
in terms of number
Josh Sled wrote:
That's right. There's a final page in the since-last-run dialog
prompting you to delete SXes that are obsolete or dead.
I'm thinking that page and functionality is going to go away in a future
SX cleanup, though.
Thanks, I'll have to watch out for that then,
I've been
Josh Sled wrote:
Oh, what're you thinking? I'm planning on re-writing most of the SX
stuff in the next month or two, so we might want to coordinate now,
before things diverge too much...
Basically I was thinking of checking every new tx as it goes into (by
entry) a register against a
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 18:57 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 18:49 -0400, Andrew Duggan wrote:
I've been hacking around in there trying to see if I can get sx processing
working a little more closely to the way I do my thing. So the first step
Oh, what're you thinking? I'm
