Re: Where the cursor ends up after delete split

2005-05-22 Thread Derek Atkins
"Edward J. Huff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here is what I think now: after a delete split, the cursor > should always end up on the next split after the one which > was deleted. Any other behavior is counterintuitive and > unexpected. The above minor disaster does not happen if > the cursor

Where the cursor ends up after delete split

2005-05-20 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 22:48, Edward J. Huff wrote: > [...] So I made a bunch of > splits with the credit field already filled in so they > wouldn't move. At the end, I had a bunch of blank splits > I wanted to delete, so I selected the split, clicked delete, > answered the dialog, selected the