"Hale Boyes, Kevin " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, I'd say that once you've saved your data file in 2.2.0 you should
> not go back to 2.0.5 and save there. This has nothing to do with the
> data file change noted in the release notes (around scheduled
> transactions).
Yea ... we should obviou
Hale Boyes, Kevin wrote:
> Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Kevin HaleBoyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I did notice one other thing. 2.0 doesn't know about the ROOT
>>> account type so it changes the type to NO_TYPE. I'm wondering how
>>> 2.2 will respond to that? Haven't tried it yet.
>>
>> W
Derek Atkins wrote:
> Kevin HaleBoyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I did notice one other thing. 2.0 doesn't know about the ROOT
>> account type so it changes the type to NO_TYPE. I'm wondering how
>> 2.2 will respond to that? Haven't tried it yet.
>
> What version of 2.0.x are you using
Kevin HaleBoyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tested it out - using a 2.2 saved file in the 2.0 version. I noticed that
> the
> display shows the Root account and it now prefixes all account names.
> Visually not great but whatever.
Right.
> I did notice one other thing. 2.0 doesn't know ab
Moved from -users.
--- Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These questions deserve to be on gnucash-devel, not gnucash-user,
> because they are all development level questions. "Users" are
> not expected to look into the data file...
>
> "Hale Boyes, Kevin " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
