gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-08 Thread David Reiser
After disabling the glib 2.16.2 problem and updating gda-dev2 to r17071, gnucash fails to launch: ERROR: Undefined variable: gnc-utf8? in the terminal window. Mac OS X 10.5.2, gcc 4.0.1, glib 2.16.1 Dave -- David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ gnu

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-08 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After disabling the glib 2.16.2 problem and updating gda-dev2 to > r17071, gnucash fails to launch: > > ERROR: Undefined variable: gnc-utf8? > > in the terminal window. > > Mac OS X 10.5.2, gcc 4.0.1, glib 2.16.1 I know that this is a new API that

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-08 Thread Charles Day
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > After disabling the glib 2.16.2 problem and updating gda-dev2 to > > r17071, gnucash fails to launch: > > > > ERROR: Undefined variable: gnc-utf8? > > > > in the termina

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-08 Thread Dave Reiser
Charles Day wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Hi, > > David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > writes: > > > After disabling the glib 2.16.2 problem and updating gda-dev2 to >

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-08 Thread Charles Day
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Dave Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles Day wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > >Hi, > > > >David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> writes: > >

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-08 Thread David Reiser
On Apr 8, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Charles Day wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Dave Reiser > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles Day wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> wrote: > >Hi, > >David Reiser <[EMAIL PROT

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-08 Thread Charles Day
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:44 PM, David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 8, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Charles Day wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Dave Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Charles Day wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-08 Thread David Reiser
On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:57 PM, Charles Day wrote: > [...] > I just looked at the branch, and it looks like the updated version. > It isn't something that would give guile 1.6.7 a problem is it? > > Oh, I believe you've got the right version in SVN. I'm just > wondering about which version of core

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-08 Thread David Reiser
On Apr 8, 2008, at 10:11 PM, David Reiser wrote: > > On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:57 PM, Charles Day wrote: >> [...] >> I just looked at the branch, and it looks like the updated version. >> It isn't something that would give guile 1.6.7 a problem is it? >> >> Oh, I believe you've got the right version i

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-09 Thread Derek Atkins
"Charles Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, I believe you've got the right version in SVN. I'm just wondering about > which version of core-utils.scm you are actually testing with, i.e. what > version was actually installed by your last 'make install'. With my setup, if > I update a .scm file

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-09 Thread Charles Day
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Charles Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Oh, I believe you've got the right version in SVN. I'm just wondering > about > > which version of core-utils.scm you are actually testing with, i.e. what > > version was actua

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-09 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> If this is true then it's a bug. "make install" should most certainly >> update the installed copy of a .scm file. >> > > What seems to happen in my environment (Windows XP) is that initially all > the .scm files get copied from the source repository (

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-09 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> AHHH! Yes, the "Win32 doesn't support Symlinks" problem. Arguably >> on win32 we really should re-copy the scheme files on every make. >> >> Sorry, I keep forgetting that you actually do real gnucash development >> on Windows! I keep thinking that al

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-09 Thread Charles Day
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If this is true then it's a bug. "make install" should most certainly > > > update the installed copy of a .scm file. > > > > > > > > What seems to happen in my environment (Wi

Re: gda-dev2 r17071

2008-04-09 Thread Charles Day
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > AHHH! Yes, the "Win32 doesn't support Symlinks" problem. Arguably > > > on win32 we really should re-copy the scheme files on every make. > > > > > > Sorry, I keep forgetting