Re: gnucash2 C binary, cashutil and scheme

2006-01-13 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:58:24AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > FYI, I agree 100% with what Chris says here! Wow, Chris, is that > a first? ;) Ha! It might be. What worries me is that it's so overcast here at the moment that I can't check to see if the Sun still shines. But, as far as I can

Re: gnucash2 C binary, cashutil and scheme

2006-01-13 Thread Derek Atkins
FYI, I agree 100% with what Chris says here! Wow, Chris, is that a first? ;) -derek Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Derek's question _could_ be interpreted as discouraging any change to > Gnucash that's not directly and obviously related to releasing G2. > Let me offer a slight

Re: gnucash2 C binary, cashutil and scheme

2006-01-12 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:28:49PM +, Neil Williams wrote: > On Wednesday 11 January 2006 11:05 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > > However, I do want to ask how this distraction is going to help get > > G2 out the door? And yes, I do consider this is a distraction right now. > > Well, if we want a C

Re: gnucash2 C binary, cashutil and scheme

2006-01-12 Thread Neil Williams
On Thursday 12 January 2006 3:11 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > There's a difference between "having a C binary" and completely > replacing the way gnucash works. (I'm only looking at overhauling how gnucash *starts*, but I accept it is more than you were considering.) > Right now we have that C bin

Re: gnucash2 C binary, cashutil and scheme

2006-01-12 Thread Derek Atkins
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 11 January 2006 11:05 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: >> However, I do want to ask how this distraction is going to help get >> G2 out the door? And yes, I do consider this is a distraction right now. > > Well, if we want a C binary to replace the

Re: gnucash2 C binary, cashutil and scheme

2006-01-11 Thread Neil Williams
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 11:05 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > However, I do want to ask how this distraction is going to help get > G2 out the door? And yes, I do consider this is a distraction right now. Well, if we want a C binary to replace the scripts for G2, then it's fairly complete. From y

Re: gnucash2 C binary, cashutil and scheme

2006-01-11 Thread Neil Williams
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 10:39 pm, Neil Williams wrote: Also, it uses the same context as other QOF CLI applications so it can provide a default session that is not based in a static variable in libqof. I should be able to pass that context (containing an input and export session amongst ot

Re: gnucash2 C binary, cashutil and scheme

2006-01-11 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Looks like an environment problem -- most likely you're either using multiple environments, or not exporting the symbol, or not loading the scheme file where the symbol is defined. I don't know offhand and I don't have time to track it down.. However, I do want to ask how this distraction i

gnucash2 C binary, cashutil and scheme

2006-01-11 Thread Neil Williams
OK, now I'm stuck. :-) http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/12326 I've got a popt-compliant, gettext-compliant, command line option handling C binary application launcher, called src/bin/gnucash2 - installed to bin/gnucash2 - in the cashutil branch. It's only four steps from the cashutil appli