On Jan 8, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op zaterdag 31 december 2011 15:29:37 schreef John Ralls:
>> The problem is that like most unix programs, guile hardcodes its
>> installation prefix into the binary and generally expects to find
>> everything it needs relative to that prefix fo
Op zaterdag 31 december 2011 15:29:37 schreef John Ralls:
> The problem is that like most unix programs, guile hardcodes its
> installation prefix into the binary and generally expects to find
> everything it needs relative to that prefix for ever after. For loading
> modules, that can be overridde
On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> On Sat, December 31, 2011 2:45 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 31, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>
>>> guile -c "(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require 'new-catalog)"
>>>
>>> Maybe we just need to do this in our install.sh script?
On Sat, December 31, 2011 2:45 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> guile -c "(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require 'new-catalog)"
>>
>> Maybe we just need to do this in our install.sh script?
>>
>
> Oh, it's there. But it's calling guile.cmd, and there is
On Dec 31, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, December 31, 2011 1:39 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On a side note: starting tomorrow I won't be much near my computer for a
>>> week,
>>> so if there are things tha
Hi,
On Sat, December 31, 2011 1:39 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>
>
>> On a side note: starting tomorrow I won't be much near my computer for a
>> week,
>> so if there are things that need my feedback, it make take some time
>> before I
>> can answer
On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op vrijdag 30 december 2011 19:44:50 schreef John Ralls:
>> On Dec 30, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>> What about backporting the feature table patch?
>>
>> Oh, did you commit that to trunk? I thought you'd done it direct to 2.4. If
Op vrijdag 30 december 2011 19:44:50 schreef John Ralls:
> On Dec 30, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > What about backporting the feature table patch?
>
> Oh, did you commit that to trunk? I thought you'd done it direct to 2.4. If
> you don't beat me to it, I'll backport it tomorrow.
>
>
On Dec 30, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> What about backporting the feature table patch?
>
Oh, did you commit that to trunk? I thought you'd done it direct to 2.4. If you
don't beat me to it, I'll backport it tomorrow.
Regards,
John Ralls
_
What about backporting the feature table patch?
-derek
Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
- Reply message -
From: "John Ralls"
Date: Fri, Dec 30, 2011 6:30 pm
Subject: r21768 - gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32 - More changes to
compile gtk-2.24.
To:
Cc:
On Dec 29, 2011, at 2:00 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2011, at 10:09 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>>
>> It's still not quite ready for release: Gnucash isn't noticing that AQB is
>> present.
>
> Which turned out to be more WebKit contamination, sort of. Ktoblzcheck needs
> a couple of li
Am Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2011, 15:11:39 schrieb John Ralls:
> >> Which turned out to be more WebKit contamination, sort of. Ktoblzcheck
> >> needs a couple of libraries from mingw (libstdc++-6.dll and
> >> libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll) and we were relying on WebKit to provide them --
> >> but it only prov
On Dec 29, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2011, 14:00:51 schrieb John Ralls:
>> On Dec 27, 2011, at 10:09 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>> It's still not quite ready for release: Gnucash isn't noticing that AQB
>>> is present.
>> Which turned out to be more Web
Am Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2011, 14:00:51 schrieb John Ralls:
> On Dec 27, 2011, at 10:09 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> > It's still not quite ready for release: Gnucash isn't noticing that AQB
> > is present.
> Which turned out to be more WebKit contamination, sort of. Ktoblzcheck needs
> a couple of l
Done.
-derek
On Wed, December 28, 2011 9:30 am, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op woensdag 28 december 2011 09:09:05 schreef Derek Atkins:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, December 28, 2011 8:36 am, Geert Janssens wrote:
>> > Op dinsdag 27 december 2011 22:09:51 schreef John Ralls:
>> >> So with the changes checked
Op woensdag 28 december 2011 09:09:05 schreef Derek Atkins:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, December 28, 2011 8:36 am, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > Op dinsdag 27 december 2011 22:09:51 schreef John Ralls:
> >> So with the changes checked in (and a reset.sh), it should build a
> >> working
> >> package... at least,
Hi,
On Wed, December 28, 2011 8:36 am, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op dinsdag 27 december 2011 22:09:51 schreef John Ralls:
>> So with the changes checked in (and a reset.sh), it should build a
>> working
>> package... at least, it does here.
>>
> I wanted to perform the reset.sh, but at this time th
Op dinsdag 27 december 2011 22:09:51 schreef John Ralls:
> Jeez, you guys give up *way* too easily! ;-)
>
I'm glad you're more persistent! ;-)
> The problem with SLib turns out to be a Guile bug: ice-9/boot-9/load-modules
> determines a absolute path isn't portable, which is why we were seeing th
On Dec 27, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 27. Dezember 2011, 22:51:46 schrieb Geert Janssens:
>>> There is enough goofiness with MinGW GCC 4.4.0 that I couldn't get it to
>>> link properly in a couple of places, and the one that ultimately kicked
>>> my butt was libgsf
Am Dienstag, 27. Dezember 2011, 22:51:46 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> > There is enough goofiness with MinGW GCC 4.4.0 that I couldn't get it to
> > link properly in a couple of places, and the one that ultimately kicked
> > my butt was libgsf->libxml2, where the linker won't accept that
> > xmlGeneri
Op dinsdag 27 december 2011 00:18:46 schreef John Ralls:
> Well, that didn't actually work out.
>
> There is enough goofiness with MinGW GCC 4.4.0 that I couldn't get it to
> link properly in a couple of places, and the one that ultimately kicked my
> butt was libgsf->libxml2, where the linker won
On Dec 24, 2011, at 11:37 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Dec 24, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>
>> Op zaterdag 24 december 2011 08:06:28 schreef John Ralls:
>>> On Dec 24, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op vrijdag 23 december 2011 21:45:02 schreef John Ralls:
> On Dec
On Dec 24, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op zaterdag 24 december 2011 08:06:28 schreef John Ralls:
>> On Dec 24, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>> Op vrijdag 23 december 2011 21:45:02 schreef John Ralls:
On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> This produce
Op zaterdag 24 december 2011 08:06:28 schreef John Ralls:
> On Dec 24, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > Op vrijdag 23 december 2011 21:45:02 schreef John Ralls:
> >> On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> >>> This produced a problem with gettext, but it's too late to
> >>> inv
On Dec 24, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op vrijdag 23 december 2011 21:45:02 schreef John Ralls:
>> On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>> This produced a problem with gettext, but it's too late to investigate
>>> tonight. I'll have a look at it in the morning.
>> After
Op vrijdag 23 december 2011 21:45:02 schreef John Ralls:
> On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> > This produced a problem with gettext, but it's too late to investigate
> > tonight. I'll have a look at it in the morning.
> After a bit of a struggle with gettext, goffice, and openSP (mi
On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:28 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>
>>> On 21-12-11 15:43, John Ralls wrote:
I got an msys-1.0.11 installation working on my windows VM yesterday and
got it
On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:28 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>
>> On 21-12-11 15:43, John Ralls wrote:
>>> I got an msys-1.0.11 installation working on my windows VM yesterday and
>>> got it to go as far as starting Gnucash (I have a link error that I t
On Dec 21, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On 21-12-11 15:43, John Ralls wrote:
>> I got an msys-1.0.11 installation working on my windows VM yesterday and got
>> it to go as far as starting Gnucash (I have a link error that I think is
>> left over from the weekend and a completely di
On 21-12-11 18:44, Geert Janssens wrote:
On 21-12-11 15:43, John Ralls wrote:
I got an msys-1.0.11 installation working on my windows VM yesterday
and got it to go as far as starting Gnucash (I have a link error that
I think is left over from the weekend and a completely different
setup using
On Dec 21, 2011, at 1:02 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On 21-12-11 03:28, John Ralls wrote:
>> Author: jralls
>> Date: 2011-12-20 21:28:48 -0500 (Tue, 20 Dec 2011)
>> New Revision: 21768
>> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21768
>>
>> Modified:
>>gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32
On 21-12-11 03:28, John Ralls wrote:
Author: jralls
Date: 2011-12-20 21:28:48 -0500 (Tue, 20 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 21768
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21768
Modified:
gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32/defaults.sh
gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32/install-impl.sh
Log
32 matches
Mail list logo
