Re: rebalancing

2000-11-27 Thread Dave Peticolas
Conrad Canterford writes: > Any thought on how this would be achieved? Are we talking an extra field > in the register, or some other arrangement (colour perhaps?). > On a vaguely related note, is it going to be possible to choose which > fields are visible in the register? I occurs to me that I n

Re: rebalancing

2000-11-21 Thread James LewisMoss
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 02:44:31 -0800, Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> Transaction Rebalancing --- Dave> Proposal Dave> 1. Rebalancing should work by computing the imbalance, and then Dave>modifying a speci

Re: rebalancing

2000-11-21 Thread Conrad Canterford
Dave Peticolas wrote: > Proposal > > 1. Rebalancing should work by computing the imbalance, and then >modifying a specially designated 'imbalance' split to bring >the transaction into balance. If the imbalance split does not >exist one will be c

rebalancing

2000-11-21 Thread Dave Peticolas
Transaction Rebalancing --- Right now, the engine rebalances transactions whenever they are commited, and sometimes during transaction modification. The engine rebalances transactions by computing the amount of the imbalance, selecting an essentially arbitrary split, and