On Wednesday 19 February 2014 15:18:03 Linas Vepstas wrote:
- remove the old content where we can, possibly moving the old
tarballs to sourceforge
Re: bandwidth: I expect to get a 1 gigabit fiber optic within the
next 6 months or so, maybe sooner, and so should be able to support
This caught my eye:
Besides, it's rather
hard to argue that gnucash belongs there in any form, since we're not
part of Gnome.
Linas could explain the historical relations.
GnuCash is one of the founding members of the Gnome Foundation. I helped
draft the Articles of Incorporation (or
- remove the old content where we can, possibly moving the old tarballs
to sourceforge
Re: bandwidth: I expect to get a 1 gigabit fiber optic within the next 6
months or so, maybe sooner, and so should be able to support dramatically
more content.
- install a permanent redirect to the
Excellent, thanks!
On 20 February 2014 02:33, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 15:18:03 Linas Vepstas wrote:
- remove the old content where we can, possibly moving the old
tarballs to sourceforge
Re: bandwidth: I expect to get a 1
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us writes:
I think keeping around history is a good thing.
Disk is cheap.
Just mark it an archive and add a README to the current location(s)
As I said, the history is preserved in git.
It's not quite the same as release tarballs.
With the old collections on
On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us writes:
I think keeping around history is a good thing.
Disk is cheap.
Just mark it an archive and add a README to the current location(s)
As I said, the history is preserved in git.
It's
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 07:08:45 John Ralls wrote:
On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us writes:
I think keeping around history is a good thing.
Disk is cheap.
Just mark it an archive and add a README to the current
Am 19.02.2014 16:20, schrieb Geert Janssens:
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 07:08:45 John Ralls wrote:
On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us writes:
:
You could do that with www.gnucash.org, but master.gnome.org (the
developer side of
On Thursday 09 January 2014 10:10:05 John Ralls wrote:
I'm reviewing/updating README in response to
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721608 , and there's a
link there to the subject URI.
It looks like the sources there stopped being updated at the end of
2010 when we released
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us writes:
Question is: should we keep providing downloads for these old versions
in the interest of archaeology ? If so the path should stay.
If not what do we do with the historical news messages ?
Delete it all. I see no benefit to maintaining archival
On Feb 18, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us writes:
Question is: should we keep providing downloads for these old versions
in the interest of archaeology ? If so the path should stay.
If not what do we do with the historical news
11 matches
Mail list logo
