On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 15:43, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > the current situation, which is to display an ugly error message.
> >
> > The gnucash-doc package (upon installation) would then install a real
> > help-topics-index.scm file over that bogus one.
>
> While a good idea in theory, it does not work
On Monday 04 August 2003 10:58 am, someone claiming to be Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> unless you ran a "make maintainer-clean" then you probably still have
> some 1.8 turds lying around in your build tree. A clean checkout of
> HEAD is probably the best solution.
Did 'make maintainer-clean', then 'm
On Sunday 03 August 2003 12:32 pm, someone claiming to be Daniel Hannum wrote:
> Yep, those two bugs are a subset of what the patch fixes. In the future,
> I will bother to check Bugzilla before I submit more bugs :)
>
> The patch is against CVS-head. There WERE changes in druid-loan.c
> recently (
Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The key point
> > is going to be some way that gnucash can read the file, but it already
> > has to read the help docs anyways.
>
> Not sure I follow you on this. But, maybe you mean gnucash will need
> to know where help-topics-index.scm is installed t
Derek Atkins wrote:
I think an "Intro to Business Accounting" chapter is reasonable, where
you introduce cash v. accrual accounting and define all the various
business features that you discuss in "later" chapters.
Yup, my thoughts exactly.
Suggested additional text:
[snip]
Okay, I'll add this te
Derek Atkins wrote:
I have no objection to this move in the longer term. Certainly not in
the 1.8 lifetime, but in HEAD/g2 we can head that way.
Good.
The key point
is going to be some way that gnucash can read the file, but it already
has to read the help docs anyways.
Not sure I follow you on
Bug #118954
-derek
Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I figured out how to get the "split transactions make account totals
> not update correctly" bug to be reproducible with a simple account
> structure. (in the past, I would only see this bug with complex
> account structures).
>
> Bui
I have no objection to this move in the longer term. Certainly not in
the 1.8 lifetime, but in HEAD/g2 we can head that way. The key point
is going to be some way that gnucash can read the file, but it already
has to read the help docs anyways.
-derek
Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> W
Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, wadda ya think about the text presented below (I just wrote it,
> criticism will be very welcome)?
It's a good start, I've got some additional text to suggest (see
below).
> Oh, also, where should this text go? A new "intro to business"
> chapter? I
Would it be acceptable if I was to try to remove help-topics-index.scm
from the gnucash main source body and move it into gnucash-docs? (not
now, as a future project)
It seems odd that help-topics-index.scm is totally dependent on
gnucash-docs, and yet resides in the gnucash package. In fact,
If it isn't a problem, could this get squeezed in for 1.8.5?
src/scm/help-topics-index.scm
Yes, it is a day after the string freeze, and it does change some strings.
Absolutely no problem if it is too late. If nothing else, this will
teach me to read my emails more closely (I thought the freez
Folks,
I've been reading up on the cash vs accrual accounting issues, and it
seems that this subject should be touched upon in the guide. However,
it seems that the issue really only exists in the business world, as
most personal finance books use the cash method. This is important for
GnuCa
Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>OK, how can I verify that I'm running HEAD?
> >>I did the following
> >>$ cp -a gnucash gnucash-head (to copy my copy of the CVS source tree)
> > What branch is your checkout?
>
> I've been maintaining a relatively current 1.8 branch via a cron'd
> scrip
On 8/4/2003 10:14 AM, someone claiming to be Derek Atkins wrote:
Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
OK, how can I verify that I'm running HEAD?
I did the following
$ cp -a gnucash gnucash-head (to copy my copy of the CVS source tree)
What branch is your checkout?
I've been maintaining a
Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, how can I verify that I'm running HEAD?
> I did the following
> $ cp -a gnucash gnucash-head (to copy my copy of the CVS source tree)
What branch is your checkout?
> $ cd gnucash-head
> $ cvs update -r HEAD -Pd
You don't need -r HEAD -- the HEAD bran
On Sunday 03 August 2003 8:23 pm, someone claiming to be Derek Atkins wrote:
> Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On a side note. Would running CVS Head be reasonably safe these days?
> > I've been wary since I thought that was where the gnome-2.0 work was
> > being done.
>
> No, the gnome
16 matches
Mail list logo
