The balancing account for all your opening balances should be an
Equity:Opening Balances account. You can create sub-accounts of this if you
need to separate different classes of opening balances. The customer
invoices would have entries of the form:
Assets:Accounts Receivable Dr
hi all
i have gnucash 3.5 and its beautiful :D
i have searched all over for an answer relating to previous year balances,
could you please confirm if i am on the right track.
firstly, a friend of mine is an accountant and we run a business. i have his
financials from excel and i am basically
Definitely.
Steve
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, at 11:49 AM, Colin Law wrote:
> Are you sure you are running 3.5? I seem to remember such a bug in one
> of the early 3.x releases.
>
> Colin
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 13:52, Stephen C. Camidge wrote:
> >
> > Using version 3.5 on Mac OS, I find the
Are you sure you are running 3.5? I seem to remember such a bug in one
of the early 3.x releases.
Colin
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 13:52, Stephen C. Camidge wrote:
>
> Using version 3.5 on Mac OS, I find the following:
>
> Reconcile a bank or credit card, but at the end, hit postpone. I do this so
Sounds like a bug. I shouldn’t think the method used to clear them should
change the fact that they show up checked or not.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Jun 14, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Stephen C. Camidge wrote:
>
> The transactions retain the 'c' but are not always checked off when I resume
> the
The transactions retain the 'c' but are not always checked off when I resume
the reconciliation vis the reconcile window.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, at 9:41 AM, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
> Not sure, but ‘partially reconciled’ is simply ‘cleared’ as you can
> change the individual transactions in
Not sure, but ‘partially reconciled’ is simply ‘cleared’ as you can change the
individual transactions in the register to ‘c’ without using the reconciliation
procedure. When you start that process, all transactions marked ‘c’ will be
checked off for you.
That status *should* be saved however,
Thanks David,
David Carlson-4 wrote
> I believe one important take-away from this thread is that there are many
> ways to use scheduled transaction s and there is no one best way that
> works
> for all users.
>
> If a developer were to tackle some of the bugs and feature requests in
> this
>
