Hi,
The cashflow report is not wrong and not right either.
See https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797093 for the full dev
understanding.
C
On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 20:45, Matthew Clay wrote:
> Gnucash Community,
>
> I have a question about the "Cash Flow" report. When I set up a simple
Hello, James:
On 2020-05-16 14:13, James Cook wrote:
I'm thinking of starting to use GnuCash. I need to file both Canada
and US taxes, which require different accounting.… Are there other
ways people handle this sort of thing?
I immigrated to Canada from the USA fifteen years ago, so I have
Hi gnucash-user list,
Background:
I'm thinking of starting to use GnuCash. I need to file both Canada
and US taxes, which require different accounting. For example, if I
sell a stock, the realized gains for Canada are based on adjusted cost
base, but for the US I can decide which instance of the
Gnucash Community,
I have a question about the "Cash Flow" report. When I set up a simple
paycheck with splits for taxes and net pay, why is it that when I run
a "Cash Flow" report on my checking account the entirety of the split
transaction is reflected in the report?
For example, for a $100
Trading splits are ignored; they don't turn on the ---split transaction--- flag
in the Transfer Account cell. I think what's causing grief is the no-value
Asset:Stock:ABC split.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On May 16, 2020, at 9:39 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> Arguably a transaction that has 2
Peter:
I have seen the same thing, about splits spontaneously re-ordering
themselves. I do not recall documentation about this, and I have not
read the code, but I have the impression that: a) GnuCash does impose an
order on splits, and b) the order is something like: splits with credit
Arguably a transaction that has 2 trading account splits and 2 regular
account splits should be treated like a regular transaction.
-derek
Sent using my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
On May 16, 2020 10:07:02 AM John Ralls wrote:
On May 16, 2020, at 4:48 AM, Adrien Monteleone
> On May 16, 2020, at 4:48 AM, Adrien Monteleone
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 16, 2020 w20d137, at 4:19 AM, Davy Roid wrote:
>>
>> Not sure whether this is a software limitation or there is a better way to
>> do this. For example, the following memorized transaction for recording
>> stock
On 15 May 2020 at 9:03, peterb said:
> I have a recurring transaction with a very complicated split. At some
> point, the splits in the recurring transaction seem to have organized
> themselves in a confusing way - seemingly not related to the order in
> which I entered them.
>
> Is there any
> On May 16, 2020 w20d137, at 4:19 AM, Davy Roid wrote:
>
> Not sure whether this is a software limitation or there is a better way to
> do this. For example, the following memorized transaction for recording
> stock dividend in USD and Dividend Income in EUR
>
>
>
At the least, Debits are moved before Credits. But if there is some other
sorting rules, I haven’t noticed.
I use auto-filled transactions extensively, but don’t see much issue with the
eventual order save some Bills/Invoices which keep re-ordering a few line items
for no apparent reason. If
Not sure whether this is a software limitation or there is a better way to
do this. For example, the following memorized transaction for recording
stock dividend in USD and Dividend Income in EUR
Totalal Deposit Withdrawal
Asset\Citibank\USD
Not sure whether this is really a limitation of memorized transactions or I
did something wrong. For example:
Memorizied Transaction - Dividend - ABC
Deposit
I have a recurring transaction with a very complicated split. At some
point, the splits in the recurring transaction seem to have organized
themselves in a confusing way - seemingly not related to the order in which
I entered them.
Is there any way to reorder splits within a transaction short of
14 matches
Mail list logo
