On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:39:36 -0400
johnny wrote:
> hola
>
> On 04/10/2018 16:20, listreader wrote:
> > The prefix is EXTREMELY useful to me. So add me to the 'approve'
> > side of your tally.
> me too.
>
> and really- what is all this bitching about? 5 extra chars at the
> front of an email s
Dave H writes:
Hello Dave,
> There is one at Nabble - http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/ ?
Thanks for the info, although my comment was just a joke...usually
discussion of people not happy with the mailing lists turns into
suggestion to create web forum as panacea for all the problems. :-D
Gour,
There is one at Nabble - http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/ ?
Cheers Dave H.
On 13 April 2018 at 01:57, Saša Janiška wrote:
> George Riner writes:
>
> > I also am subscribed to about 20 email lists and Gnucash was the only
> > one that did *not* have bracketed tag in the subject line
George Riner writes:
> I also am subscribed to about 20 email lists and Gnucash was the only
> one that did *not* have bracketed tag in the subject line.
I still haven't seen list of mailing clients which are *not* capable to
perform filtering by List-Id and if it is really such a problem, maybe
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 07:14:36AM -0700, George Riner wrote:
> I also am subscribed to about 20 email lists and Gnucash was the only one
> that did *not* have bracketed tag in the subject line.
+1
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lec
I also am subscribed to about 20 email lists and Gnucash was the only one that
did *not* have bracketed tag in the subject line.
: George
-- -- --
Sent by Droid.
On April 12, 2018 1:34:08 AM PDT, "Saša Janiška" wrote:
>William Bixby writes:
>
>> I'm surprised at the objections, as my experienc
William Bixby writes:
> I'm surprised at the objections, as my experience is that mail lists
> adding the list ID in the subject is the 'norm' and very common. The
> few, like gnucash was, that don't are the outlier.
I follow about 20 mailing lists and gnucash-users is the only one having
prefi
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:17:59 -0500
Adrien Monteleone wrote:
> My questions were rhetorical as I noted in a later reply to him. I
> knew what his mail client was and what its abilities are. (I could
> see it in the header) My point was that if he wants to ‘filter’ his
> mail, he has the tools to d
On 04/11/2018 11:17, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
Seriously? Everyone has to have this tag added because *some* people either
don’t know how or don’t *want* to use the features of their own e-mail client?
even in our small group, you must have seen that some people want this
feature to do the fil
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:17:59AM -0500, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
> My questions were rhetorical as I noted in a later reply to him. I knew what
> his mail client was and what its abilities are. (I could see it in the
> header) My point was that if he wants to ‘filter’ his mail, he has the tool
Adrien:
You have hit the nail on the head!
Given all the time given to this thread, I think it is high time to end
it. It has been a hugh distraction from what this list is all about.
Just my $.02 worth.
Les
On 04/11/2018 10:17 AM, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
I think this thread also illust
I think this thread also illustrates that how people hit ‘reply/reply-all’ and
to which message can break threads. So far I think it has at least 5 parts. I’d
have to look at the archive page to be sure. Now we’re at a point where people
are replying to broken off or stalled sections of the thre
hi
On 04/10/2018 17:17, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
What is your e-mail client? Can it not filter mail? Can it not tag mail? Can it
not handle mailing-lists?
isn't that up to each of us to decide what client to use? and how to
manage our own email flows? shouldn't it be irrelevant to this discus
2018-04-11T08:31:28+0100 Colin Law wrote:
> If we are not supposed to use Reply All then could someone please
> adjust the list settings so that Reply goes back to the list and not
Technically, according to some RFCs, this isn't a good idea, also see
([1]). Munging makes the direct contact with th
hola
On 04/10/2018 16:20, listreader wrote:
The prefix is EXTREMELY useful to me. So add me to the 'approve' side
of your tally.
me too.
and really- what is all this bitching about? 5 extra chars at the front
of an email subject ...
humans have a great ability to not see what is right in fr
I'm against it too. We use [] tags at work to indicate the relevant project
for an email thread, but with this mailing list gmail can use the
'gnucash-user' email to tag all mails from this thread. I would assume that
many other email clients also offer such facilities.
--
__̴ı ̡͌l̡̡̡ ̡͌l̡*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴
I also prefer keeping the subject prefix.
Ray
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Adrien Monteleone <
adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> What is your e-mail client? Can it not filter mail? Can it not tag mail?
> Can it not handle mailing-lists?
>
> Regards,
> Adrien
>
> > On Apr 10
On 09/04/18 13:41, Stephen Albert wrote:
I'd also prefer [GC] over [GNC].
I prefer nothing. The [GNC] looks quite dreadful as it is completely
unneeded. I'm on gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gnucash.user, why do I need some
stupid piece of data confirming something that I all ready know?
--
My fel
On 11 April 2018 at 06:15, Dave H wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> Please note the following as Reply All apparently has unintended
> consequences.
>
> Cheers Dave H.
>
>
> Hello Dave...
>
> Please edit the message's 'to' list before you reply to a mailing list
> message. I read the list, I get the mess
Yep, as noted earlier in the thread (and another thread some weeks ago) I don’t
think that Mailman setting is working properly.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Apr 11, 2018, at 12:15 AM, Dave H wrote:
>
> Hello people,
>
> Please note the following as Reply All apparently has unintended
> consequences.
I can see the X-mailer header. I’m aware of Claws Mail. The questions were
rhetorical, sorry.
Interesting though that you have 154 filters shoveling mail into 80 folders
(with 28 of them top level) yet you prefer to ‘filter’ gnucash-user without any
of that...
You’re right, this is ridiculous.
Hello people,
Please note the following as Reply All apparently has unintended
consequences.
Cheers Dave H.
Hello Dave...
Please edit the message's 'to' list before you reply to a mailing list
message. I read the list, I get the message you send to the list, I
don't need an additional copy sen
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:11:43 +0500
D wrote:
> I am fully aware of the limitations of self-selected surveys and
> their validity of gauging sentiment. I was not intending to submit my
> research to any peer reviewed journals. I *will* note that the
> replies to my own non-scientific survey continu
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:17:55 -0500
Adrien Monteleone wrote:
> What is your e-mail client? Can it not filter mail? Can it not tag
> mail? Can it not handle mailing-lists?
Hello Adrien...
Mail clients are usually identified in the email header (X-mailer,
User-Agent, or etc) so I'm not sure why yo
To be fair, and as I noted in another reply, not often around these parts. But
I have seen it on other lists. The most likely case would be devs from other
projects (maybe GTK) getting involved in a discussion on the gnucash-devel list.
However, I see the dev list now has their own tag, which is
t;Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
>>Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:17:55 -0500
>>To: Gnucash Users ><mailto:gnucash-user@gnucash.org>>
>>Subject: Re: [GNC] Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
>>List-Id:
OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:17:55 -0500
> To: Gnucash Users
> Subject: Re: [GNC] Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
> List-Id: General Accounting Discussions
>
>
>
> On 04/10/2018 06:17 PM, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
>> The mai
Oh yes, I was looking at the detailed headers from my webmail version.
only 4 tags displayed with details turned off, 43 header tags in detail.
But no mailing-list, closest is list-id.
Many of the tags are prefixed X- and appear to be tags added by the
ISP's virus and spam processing or details
2018-04-10T21:44:15-0400 William Bixby wrote:
> Interesting, in my emails from Gnucash I do not see any headers with tags
> mailing-list
> mailed-by
Depends on email reader software (or webmail if you use it), although
good webmail also let's you inspect the message in raw form (which will
of cour
Yes please can we have emojis instead :-)
Your concerns are also mine, it was requested by one person who didn't seem
to be a regular reader/contributor and someone else that also looked to be
a non-contributor to the mailing list followed up with a wow this is a
great idea. Despite a few people
Ralph,
I am fully aware of the limitations of self-selected surveys and their validity
of gauging sentiment. I was not intending to submit my research to any peer
reviewed journals.
I *will* note that the replies to my own non-scientific survey continue to
trend at about three to one against,
: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:17:55 -0500
To: Gnucash Users mailto:gnucash-user@gnucash.org>>
Subject: Re: [GNC] Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
List-Id: General Accounting Discussions http://gnucash-user.gnucash.org>>
On 04/10/2018 06:17 PM, Adrien Monteleone wro
age show this email is from you, not the
> list:
> From: Adrien Monteleone
> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:17:55 -0500
> To: Gnucash Users
> Subject: Re: [GNC] Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
> List-Id: G
Adrien, my headers for your message show this email is from you, not the
list:
From: Adrien Monteleone
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:17:55 -0500
To: Gnucash Users
Subject: Re: [GNC] Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
List-Id: General
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
I can see how cross-posted messages would turn into tag soup if every list
followed this behavior.
Adrien,
Without intending to take the thread onto a different track, how common
are corss-posted messages? Where are they cross-posted? I've not s
The mail already *is* from the list.
This can get flubbed when people start using reply-all and leaving the original
senders in the mix. As this continues in the thread, individual e-mail
addresses start bouncing around between To and CC and the list address usually
gets relegated to CC permane
I do the same.
I’ve noticed though that despite Mailman being set not to deliver duplicates if
you are also in the To or CC fields, it does so anyway. I think it was Geert
who did that as a test a few weeks back and I got two copies, one got filed
(the list copy) and the other stayed in my inbo
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Dale Alspach wrote:
Question for those who want the [GNC] prefix: Would having the email from
be from the list (gnucash-user@gnucash.org) instead of the user (original
sender) serve as well?
Dale,
Doesn't matter to me, in most cases. When I reply to a message that has
b
Question for those who want the [GNC] prefix:
Would having the email from be from the list (gnucash-user@gnucash.org)
instead of the user (original sender) serve as well?
This would also help with the "remember to reply to the list" issue. Reply,
Reply-all, Reply-list would include the list addres
I like the GNC prefix.
I have 20 mail lists that I subscribe to.
17 use the subject prefix which results in precise filtering to my
folders at my ISP level (I don't need to filter locally, so I can access
the emails in the proper folders no matter which platform and therefore
email client I us
Ralph,
What is your e-mail client? Can it not filter mail? Can it not tag mail? Can it
not handle mailing-lists?
Regards,
Adrien
> On Apr 10, 2018, at 3:20 PM, listreader wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 22:00:33 +0500
> "David T. via gnucash-user" wrote:
>
>> I have tallied up the responses
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, listreader wrote:
Your tally probably doesn't mean what you think it means. In my
experience, far more people are likely to complain about 'changes' they
don't like than are people who approve or are neutral about the same
'changes'. Like on a ratio of 10 to 1 or greater.
t; From: gnucash-user
> > [mailto:gnucash-user-bounces+diamondhranchqh=earthlink@gnucash.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Alex Aycinena
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 3:01 PM
> > To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> > Subject: Re: [GNC] Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
&
3:01 PM
> To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> Subject: Re: [GNC] Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
>
> 24 against
>
>
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Les
> > To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> > Cc:
> > Bcc:
> > Date
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 22:00:33 +0500
"David T. via gnucash-user" wrote:
> I have tallied up the responses regarding subject prefixes thus far,
> and it appears that 7 people are in favor of this change.
>
> In contrast, 20 people (including three of the development team) have
> expressed negative
25 against!
-Original Message-
From: gnucash-user
[mailto:gnucash-user-bounces+diamondhranchqh=earthlink@gnucash.org] On
Behalf Of Alex Aycinena
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 3:01 PM
To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org
Subject: Re: [GNC] Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
24 against
24 against
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Les
> To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:15:29 -0500
> Subject: Re: [GNC] Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
> 23.
>
>
> On 04/10/2018
22
On 10 Apr 2018 at 11:28, Ronal B Morse wrote:
> Make that 21. But, it's not a big issue for me.
>
> RBM
>
> On 04/10/2018 11:00 AM, David T. via gnucash-user wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am responding to the original email because there have been
> quite a few responses to this thread.
> >
>
23.
On 04/10/2018 12:40 PM, Mike Evans wrote:
22
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gman
22
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mail
Make that 21. But, it's not a big issue for me.
RBM
On 04/10/2018 11:00 AM, David T. via gnucash-user wrote:
Hello,
I am responding to the original email because there have been quite a few
responses to this thread.
I have tallied up the responses regarding subject prefixes thus far, and it
Hello,
I am responding to the original email because there have been quite a few
responses to this thread.
I have tallied up the responses regarding subject prefixes thus far, and it
appears that 7 people are in favor of this change.
In contrast, 20 people (including three of the development t
Alain,
You said you use Mutt. You are one of the few (2 so far?) requesting and
defending this change.
Did you read the Mutt manual? Specifically:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#using-lists (and also:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#lists)
"Mutt has a few configuration options that make deal
I didn’t even have to tell Gmail anything. (at least for the webmail client) It
automatically put all list mail in the ‘Forum’ tab for me.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Apr 10, 2018, at 7:27 AM, Colin Law wrote:
>
> On 10 April 2018 at 12:51, Adonay Felipe Nogueira
> wrote:
>> 2018-04-10T09:51:58+020
Good point.
Since filtering is a personal preference, I don’t think its method should be
decided by the list.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Apr 10, 2018, at 7:14 AM, Saša Janiška wrote:
>
> Alain Williams writes:
>
>> All very nice if you want to do that; some do, some don't.
>
> Personally I do n
I dislike it as well and would prefer not to have it.
For your information it gets even worse for cross-posted messages. Such
messages get all of the individual prefixes of each list added. I can't think
what will happen when one replies to such a message...
Geert
Op dinsdag 10 april 2018 16:4
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:34 AM Alain Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:48:13PM +, Buddha Buck wrote:
>
> > I concur. Gmail does server-side filtering and labelling, not
> client-side.
>
> Please be aware that not everyone uses gmail.
>
The topic of conversation was about which e
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:48:13PM +, Buddha Buck wrote:
> I concur. Gmail does server-side filtering and labelling, not client-side.
Please be aware that not everyone uses gmail.
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lecturer.
+44 (0)
;bundles", such as "gnucash". It does this behind the scenes
by adding a gmail label to the mail.
Which means that when I look at this email in gmail, I'll see it
listed as "gnucash
gnucash/gnucash-user [GNC] Re: GNC Addition of Mailing List Subject
Prefix", which is getti
On 10 April 2018 at 12:51, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> 2018-04-10T09:51:58+0200 Saša Janiška wrote:
>> E.g. gnucash-users list uses Mailman which does provide e.g. List-Id
>> header for simple filtering...
>
> Probably some weak webmail client full of non-free software through
> client-side Ja
Alain Williams writes:
> All very nice if you want to do that; some do, some don't.
Personally I do not mind too much since I use Gmane, but isn't it
strange that *all* users are paying the 'price' for users that "don't
want to do that" (aka mail filtering) ? ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
As the ign
Is it possible to put [GNC] tag at the end of the subject.
Those who filter on subject will still be able to use it
and those who are disturbed by additional unnecessary tagging would be
happy too.
Amish.
On Tuesday 10 April 2018 05:09 PM, Alain Williams wrote:
The point is that different
2018-04-10T09:51:58+0200 Saša Janiška wrote:
> E.g. gnucash-users list uses Mailman which does provide e.g. List-Id
> header for simple filtering...
Probably some weak webmail client full of non-free software through
client-side JavaScript, such as Gmail and Outlook's webmail. They do
have filters
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:31:32AM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> 2018-04-06T11:08:57+1000 Steve Parry wrote:
> > when eye scanning and the option to have a mail client rule to filter
> > them into a separate folder.
>
> Some email clients, for example GNU Emacs Gnus, allows you to do emai
2018-04-06T11:08:57+1000 Steve Parry wrote:
> when eye scanning and the option to have a mail client rule to filter
> them into a separate folder.
Some email clients, for example GNU Emacs Gnus, allows you to do email
splitting, in which you can make groups/directories that will hold email
message
been off line for a few days, +1 here!
It seems to me to only add redundant info which clutters the UI; there is
enough in the headers to allow a variety of automated filtering schemes and
computers (and GC in particular) are supposed to be good at following rules to
automate repetitive manua
Mark Lawrence writes:
> I see it as a fourth rate solution to a problem that simply does not
> exist. As I've said previously just point your email/news reader app
> at news.gmane.org and get all of the filtering done for free.
+1 for Gmane, but I also wonder what mail clients do people use tha
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 03:46:54PM +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> I see it as a fourth rate solution to a problem that simply does not
> exist. As I've said previously just point your email/news reader
> app at news.gmane.org and get all of the filtering done for free.
> Setting this up takes at l
I'd also prefer [GC] over [GNC].
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Andy Pastuszak wrote:
> GNC happens to be the name of a vitamin store in the US that does a pretty
> good job of spamming my inbox. I don't know if using GNC is the best
> option. Why not just use GnuCash?
>
> Andy
>
>
> On 4/8/2
On 09/04/18 15:18, Alain Williams wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 07:14:11PM +0500, D via gnucash-user wrote:
I reiterate my objections to these changes, and note that as the prefixes get
longer, it gets harder and harder for readers using small screens (think smart
phones or tablets) to see th
2018 11:08:57 +1000
> > > From: Steve Parry
> > > To: 'Gnucash Users'
> > > Subject: Addition of Mailing List Subject Prefix
> > > Reply-To: spa...@vidar.com.au
> > >
> > > Hi everyone (especially Admins).
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:59:20AM -0400, Stan Brown wrote:
> Or why not use nothing, since people who want to filter have the ability to
> do that with or without a prefix?
Because some of us don't mechanically filter, but use the Subject line to
visually filter. This I do effectively, my MUA
Or why not use nothing, since people who want to filter have the ability to do
that with or without a prefix?
--
Stan Brown
the_stan_br...@fastmail.fm
http://BrownMath.com
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Andy Pastuszak wrote:
> GNC happens to be the name of a vitam
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 07:14:11PM +0500, D via gnucash-user wrote:
> I reiterate my objections to these changes, and note that as the prefixes get
> longer, it gets harder and harder for readers using small screens (think
> smart phones or tablets) to see the actual subject of a given email.
I
I reiterate my objections to these changes, and note that as the prefixes get
longer, it gets harder and harder for readers using small screens (think smart
phones or tablets) to see the actual subject of a given email.
Bleah!
David T.
On April 9, 2018, at 5:07 PM, Andy Pastuszak wrote:
GNC
GNC happens to be the name of a vitamin store in the US that does a
pretty good job of spamming my inbox. I don't know if using GNC is the
best option. Why not just use GnuCash?
Andy
On 4/8/2018 8:39 PM, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
Drop the @ in the first rule and you can cut the second rule
Drop the @ in the first rule and you can cut the second rule out. But really,
what you have here isn’t difficult.
You’d only need the 3rd one if JohnR sends you frequent PMs. When anyone does
that for me, I just drag and drop on those off occasions after I’ve read it. (a
PM is usually something
Interesting.
But this wasn’t that difficult even many moons ago to set up:
Regards,
Adrien
> On Apr 8, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Chris Marusich wrote:
>
> http://david.woodhou.se/reply-to-list.html
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To
Another +1 for reverting it.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Apr 8, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Stan Brown wrote:
>
> +1++
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Regards,
> Stan Brown
> Tompkins County, New York, USA
> http://BrownMath.com
> http://OakRoadSystems.com
>
>
> On 2018-04-08 13:21, Saša Janiška wrote:
>> John Ralls wr
So not so difficult for you :-)
Cheers Dave H.
On 9 April 2018 at 08:11, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> On 04/08/2018 03:29 PM, Fross, Michael wrote:
> > Add me to the dislike list. A simple filtering of the "FROM" field works
> > easily. I don't see what all the concern is about.
> >
>
> I guess
On 04/08/2018 03:29 PM, Fross, Michael wrote:
> Add me to the dislike list. A simple filtering of the "FROM" field works
> easily. I don't see what all the concern is about.
>
I guess it depends on what you mean by simple.
So far I need these three to catch everything I want in my GnuCash-ML
ma
On 08/04/18 02:03, Dave H wrote:
I'd rather you didn't do this at all, I typically just scan down the
subject line of all the emails in my inbox and it's just annoying to try
and ignore the crap on the beginning of the subject line !!
I save my poor old Mk I eyeballs the strain of scanning
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Fross, Michael wrote:
Add me to the dislike list. A simple filtering of the "FROM" field works
easily. I don't see what all the concern is about.
Well, I'll throw in my $0.02 worth.
I run Slackware linux and my own MTA (postfix) using procmail as the local
delivery age
Add me to the dislike list. A simple filtering of the "FROM" field works
easily. I don't see what all the concern is about.
Michael
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Chris Marusich wrote:
> "Liz" writes:
>
> > While others have mentioned filtering on the "To" field, it's also
> > been necessar
"Liz" writes:
> While others have mentioned filtering on the "To" field, it's also
> been necessary to filter on the "CC" field.
Anyone reading this thread might also be interested in the following
essay, which describes the pros and cons of various methods for
filtering list email:
http://davi
Yes, I agree. Just because one or two people ask for something does not
mean it should be made mandatory on everyone.
--
Regards,
Stan Brown
Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://BrownMath.com
http://OakRoadSystems.com
On 2018-04-07 21:01, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 6:56 PM,
+1++
:-)
--
Regards,
Stan Brown
Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://BrownMath.com
http://OakRoadSystems.com
On 2018-04-08 13:21, Saša Janiška wrote:
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> Add me to the list of folks who dislike this change.
>
> +1
___
gnucas
John Ralls writes:
> Add me to the list of folks who dislike this change.
+1
Sincerely,
Gour
--
When your intelligence has passed out of the dense forest
of delusion, you shall become indifferent to all that has
been heard and all that is to be heard.
___
Add me to the list of folks who dislike this change.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On Apr 7, 2018, at 11:32 PM, Amish wrote:
>
> Even I feel it annoying and unnecessary.
>
> Here is what w3c (World Wide Web Consortium) which develops Web standards has
> to say about adding subject in their own maili
Even I feel it annoying and unnecessary.
Here is what w3c (World Wide Web Consortium) which develops Web
standards has to say about adding subject in their own mailing list.
Source: https://www.w3.org/Mail/subject-tagging
Subject tagging is not a reliable way to identify mail from a
mai
[GNC] +1 to this and to Frank’s objections.
[GNC] I find such prefixes exceedingly annoying.
[GNC] And making the change because of one or two people’s preference is rather
autocratic.
[GNC] David T.
[GNC] See what I did there?
[GNC] :)
> On Apr 8, 2018, at 6:03 AM, Dave H wrote:
>
> I'd
I'd rather you didn't do this at all, I typically just scan down the
subject line of all the emails in my inbox and it's just annoying to try
and ignore the crap on the beginning of the subject line !!
On Sun, 8 Apr. 2018, 10:22 am Liz, wrote:
> Steve Parry wrote:
> > Thank you Liz😊
> >
>
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Steve Parry wrote:
>
> Adding a prefix does not stop you continuing your method, and at the same
> time also meets the request of us "dinosaurs" 😊
>
And annoys the rest of us that were happy with things they way that we
were. At the least, there should have been a
That would be annoying, but that's not normal behavior, as can be seen from
this reply.
Cheers...Steve
--
Sent from my Nexus 5X Android device. Please excuse my brevity.
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription
Most likely because German users have this annoying habit of using Aw:
instead of Re: when replying... ;-)
-derek
Sent using my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
On April 7, 2018 8:34:12 PM "Frank H. Ellenberger"
wrote:
Am 08.04.2018 um 01:56 schrieb Steve Parry:
> Hi Frank.
> Addin
Am 08.04.2018 um 01:56 schrieb Steve Parry:
> Hi Frank.
> Adding a prefix does not stop you continuing your method, and at the same
> time also meets the request of us "dinosaurs" 😊
> Cheers...Steve
>
We have this annoyimg prefix on Gnucash-de. And everytime you change the
subject, it gets inse
Steve Parry wrote:
> Thank you Lizð
>
> Commonly, list prefixes are in square brackets to be more unique and make
> it clear it's a prefix.
>
> Any chance of changing them to [GNC] etc?
>
> Thank you again!
> Cheers...Steve
Yes, I already spotted that lapse and amended it.
Liz
___
Hi Frank.
Adding a prefix does not stop you continuing your method, and at the same time
also meets the request of us "dinosaurs" 😊
Cheers...Steve
--
Sent from my Nexus 5X Android device. Please excuse my brevity.
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-
Am 08.04.2018 um 00:58 schrieb Liz:
:
> I've put in GNC for this list, and GNC-dev for the development list. While
> others have mentioned filtering on the "To" field, it's also been
> necessary to filter on the "CC" field.
> Liz
Please, do not. That is Computer Ice Age.
The easiest and most uniq
Thank you Liz😊
Commonly, list prefixes are in square brackets to be more unique and make it
clear it's a prefix.
Any chance of changing them to [GNC] etc?
Thank you again!
Cheers...Steve
--
Sent from my Nexus 5X Android device. Please excuse my brevity.
___
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo