is a way to do it algorithmically in Gnumeric but I am unfamilar
with the goal-seeker functionality in Gnumeric.
--
---
Dr. Daniel P. Dougherty
Michigan State University
Lyman Briggs College of Science and
Dept. of Statistics and Probability
E25C Holmes Hall
East
I've found with Windows Vista producing histograms or regression on even
moderately large datasets will lead to hangs (long periods of inactivity).
This is not a bug in Gnumeric but an issue with RAM usage and Vista. The fix
is to have students or your users either:
1) Remove some apps from
I am interested to install Gnumeric on a Mac. What method of installation on
Mac have people found most successful/reliable?
___
gnumeric-list mailing list
gnumeric-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
If I have a data with several different values having the same frequency is
there a way to have Descriptive Statistics return each of these? In this
example I might want Gnumeric to tell me that both 2 and 6 are modes.
Under the Statistics Tab of the Descriptive Statistics dialog it might be
Under the bins tab on the histogram dialog there is a possible error in the
labels. The issue is how to capture the finite minimum and maximum data
values in a bin?? I think it is more correct that the 8 rules should each be
stated as:
(-inf,*),[*,*),...,[*,*),[*,+inf)
(-inf,*],(*,*],...,(*
sense is that the current labeling scheme for histogram will seem at odds
with what a typical end-user would/will expect/want.
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 01:44:55 pm Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 13:32 -0500, Daniel P. Dougherty wrote:
> > Under the bins tab on the
Sorry if this starts to sound rant-ish (it's really not).
It might be cleaner to have a check box way back in the "Graphs & Options"
tab to provide the option to the user to normalize the frequencies by bin
width rather than have the "Histogram chart" option forcibly (and silently) do
this.
eformat the numbers to whatever you
> like!
>
> > You also can't apply the number formatting tools to this
> > text (e.g. "Scientific notation" or certain number of decimals etc)
>
> Why not? Did you try? There is no text (that's all an illusion!)
On Tuesda
On Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:57:51 am Andreas Guelzow wrote:
> Consider the following (discrete) example data:
> 2
> 10
> 10
> 5
> 9
> 2
> 5
> 10
> 8
> 10
>
> This would be really simple:
>
> 1) run the analysis
> 2) format the spreadsheet c
It used to be in prior versions of Gnumeric that you could select the entire
column by clicking on the column header when doing a linear regression. Now
when I do this I just get gibberish.
SUMMARY OUTPUT Response Variable: Column 2
On Monday, February 14, 2011 04:40:24 pm Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:35 -0500, Daniel P. Dougherty wrote:
> > It used to be in prior versions of Gnumeric that you could select the
> > entire column by clicking on the column header when doing a linear
>
On Monday, February 14, 2011 10:18:14 pm Andreas Guelzow wrote:
> Gnumeric is intended to produce essentially the same calculation results
> as Excel (+- some obvious bug fixes.) As a consequence empty cells have
> to produce 0 when used in a calculation.
>
> I am looking forward to see your sprea
After running macports with commands:
sudo port selfupdate
sudo port install gnumeric
I get a glib2 failed due to upgrade to goffice failed (see log below).
Are there any known work-arounds for this situation to get gnumeric to install
on a macbook pro?
-
macbook-pro:~home sudo po
> All the best
> Hal
>
> On 18/Feb/11 7:36 AM, Daniel P. Dougherty wrote:
> > After running macports with commands:
> >
> > sudo port selfupdate
> > sudo port install gnumeric
> >
> > I get a glib2 failed due to upgrade to goffice failed (see log
14 matches
Mail list logo
