Okay, done. Or at least initiated. Blurb description change has to wait a while longer.
Nils Gillmann transcribed 2.5K bytes: > Christian Grothoff transcribed 4.1K bytes: > > On 06/28/2018 04:13 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote: > > > link in line 1 returns: > > > > > > package: gnunet > > > doc-category: Internet > > > doc-summary: Secure, decentralized, peer-to-peer networking framework > > > doc-url: http://gnunet.org/book > > > gplv3-status: depends-on-mysql (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) > > > > Should be corrected to AGPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > > > > > activity-status: ok 201404008 (0.10.1, java-0.10.1, gtk-0.10.1, > > > fuse-0.10.0/20131222) > > > > > > package: libextractor > > > logo: /software/libextractor/extractor_logo.png > > > doc-category: Audio > > > doc-summary: Library to extract meta-data from media files > > > doc-url: htmlxref > > > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) > > > > Should be corrected to GPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > > > > > activity-status: stale 20131223 (1.3) > > > > > > package: libmicrohttpd > > > copyright-holder: notfsf > > > language: c > > > doc-category: Libraries > > > doc-summary: C library implementing an HTTP 1.1 server > > > doc-url: /software/libmicrohttpd/manual/ > > > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet-lgplv2.1+ > > > > Should be LGPLv3+. > > > > > For 1 I propose to correct the doc-url entry, we already have a first > > > initial state of https://docs.gnunet.org publicly accessible. > > > > Sure. > > > > > license status does only reflect the latest release (maybe its intended > > > to be that way?). > > > > No, it's just way outdated. > > > > > libextractor is not stale in development. > > > > And had more recent releases. > > > > > lmhd had more recent releases I think. > > > > Yes, 0.9.59 by now. > > > > > For 2: Let us rewrite the text. I've seen that you were active at the new > > > website with a small fitting description, and we should sync that. The > > > current package description was adjusted by myself at some point in the > > > last couple of years. > > > > Well, that sounds like you know _how_ to do this, so please do! :-) > > > > Thanks for you reply. > > I know who to call (not the Ghostbusters). > That's all. I'll see what I can achieve. > > I think we wait for adjusting the description > text of gnunet until the new website is online > and the description text production ready? At > least that's what I would do. > > > _______________________________________________ > > GNUnet-developers mailing list > > GNUnet-developers@gnu.org > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers > > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > GNUnet-developers@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers