Re: Proof of email ownership

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:11:26 +0930, Alphax said: Your other assumption is that everyone has continuous and unrestricted (no proxies, firewalls) internet access. I can't even get GPG to work To clarify this: It is NOT a change of the trust modeel but an optional feature. Without access to the

Re: more than one message digest per signed message?

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 19:02:21 +0200, Thomas Kuehne said: Is it possible to use more than one message digest when signing a message with GnuPG? No. Shalom-Salam, Werner ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org

[Fwd: Re: Proof of email ownership]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Forwarded since it seems useful - Original Message Subject: Re: Proof of email ownership Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:07:24 +0200 From: Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alphax [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: gnupg-users@gnupg.org

validate_key_list failed

Hi! After adding some keys recently, I always get: gpg: public key 6E05F681 is 27717 seconds newer than the signature gpg: public key 8D1C8442 is 86014 seconds newer than the signature gpg: public key 8D1C8442 is 86010 seconds

secret key not available

We recently generated a new key pair because of a server domain change. We generated a new armored public key and provided it to companies that send us files via ftp. They have encrypted files with our new public key and sent these files. We cannot decrypt them. Here is what we get when we

Re: Proof of email ownership

On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:37:10 +0200, Bernd Jendrissek said: Do these TXT records support having multiple keys associated with the same email address? For example, I use D7CBA633 for everyday signing and encryption, and 24EEB426 for tin foil hat applications. No. I can be extended to allow for

Re: Proof of email ownership

Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:37:10 +0200, Bernd Jendrissek said: Do these TXT records support having multiple keys associated with the same email address? For example, I use D7CBA633 for everyday signing and encryption, and 24EEB426 for tin foil hat

Re: Proof of email ownership

Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To create a signature on an email (or any other data) you would use: gpg -s [EMAIL PROTECTED]@example.org foo I get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg -s [EMAIL PROTECTED]@extundo.com foo You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: “Simon

Re: Proof of email ownership

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:24:50 +0200, Simon Josefsson said: gpg: can't put notation data into v3 (PGP 2.x style) signatures [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Is my key unusable with this scheme? For better compatibility with pre OpenPGP implementations, gpg creates v3 signatures with v3 keys (yours). v3

Automaticaly import public keys by e-mails

Hello, I have a long list of emails. I want to look them up on a keyserver and automatically import any matches. I tried gpg --search-keys [EMAIL PROTECTED] input.txt where input.txt is 1,2,3,4,5\n but it did not work. Thanks for help. David smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic

Extra information in public key

Hello, I want to provide as much information about me as possible when I send mails. I am amazed that you can save a photo as a part of you public key. How can I save more information? (telephone, address, age, etc...) David signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Extra information in public key

Hello, I just found up-to-date RFC 2440: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-14.txt Here is 5.12: 5.12. User Attribute Packet (Tag 17) The User Attribute packet is a variation of the User ID packet. It is capable of storing more types of data than the

Arguments for inline PGP (was: Leave clearsigned content encoding alone, how?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just say no to inline PGP! Some reasons I use inline: * My email has a much better chance of reaching people whose systems bounce (or discard!) attachments. * It is easy to transfer my message to another format (such as a webpage) while keeping