-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:15:16PM +0300, Pawel Shajdo wrote:
>
>>Salve!
>>Can somebody explain me what is "back signatures"?
>>Manual not very clear about this.
>
>
> It's a countermeasure against an attack against signing sub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:47:08PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>>David Shaw wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:24:09PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:15:16PM +0300, Pawel Shajdo wrote:
>
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:47:08PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:24:09PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:15:16PM +0300, Pawel Shajdo wrote:
> >>
> >>>Salve!
> >>>Can somebody explain me what is "back signatures"?
> >>>Manual not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:24:09PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:15:16PM +0300, Pawel Shajdo wrote:
>>
>>>Salve!
>>>Can somebody explain me what is "back signatures"?
>>>Manual not very clear about this.
On 11/4/05, Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess it depends on how your paranoia works, and about whom you choose to
> be paranoid. Does the NSA recommend ECC for government use so that another
> government agency (e.g., the NSA) can read, if necessary or desired by the
> parties t
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:59:01PM +, Nicholas Cole wrote:
> Am I right that there is no easy way to create an
> expiring UID (as opposed to an expiring key).
>
> --ask-cert-expire seems to be ignored when using
> adduid in the edit menu.
>
> Is there a good reason for this?
Honestly, no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
markus reichelt wrote:
> * Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> markus reichelt wrote (in part):
>>
>>
>>> Mainly, because I think that the guys with the small ... glasses ;-)
>>> at NSA can break public key crypto quite easily,
>>
>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:24:09PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:15:16PM +0300, Pawel Shajdo wrote:
> > Salve!
> > Can somebody explain me what is "back signatures"?
> > Manual not very clear about this.
>
> It's a countermeasure against an attack against signing subkeys.
>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:15:16PM +0300, Pawel Shajdo wrote:
> Salve!
> Can somebody explain me what is "back signatures"?
> Manual not very clear about this.
It's a countermeasure against an attack against signing subkeys.
Basically, the primary key signs all subkeys. With backsigs, the
signing
Salve!
Can somebody explain me what is "back signatures"?
Manual not very clear about this.
Vale!
--
Pawel I. Shajdo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
* Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> markus reichelt wrote (in part):
>
> > Mainly, because I think that the guys with the small ... glasses
> > ;-) at NSA can break public key crypto quite easily,
>
> Could you give a basis for this assertion?
Well... please understand that it is my
* "John W. Moore III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps he believes TRANSLTR actually exists.
Perhaps he does not even know what TRANSLTR is, exactly. But he does
know about A.
--
left blank, right bald
pgp6Oio1k78rp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> markus reichelt wrote (in part):
>
>
>>>Mainly, because I think that the guys with the small ... glasses
>>>;-) at NSA can break public key crypto quite easily,
>
>
> Could you give a basis for this assertion?
>
> Is i
Am I right that there is no easy way to create an
expiring UID (as opposed to an expiring key).
--ask-cert-expire seems to be ignored when using
adduid in the edit menu.
Is there a good reason for this?
Best, N.
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
markus reichelt wrote (in part):
> Mainly, because I think that the guys with the small ... glasses
> ;-) at NSA can break public key crypto quite easily,
Could you give a basis for this assertion?
Is it because you think they have so much computer
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 13:52:46 +0300, vitaly said:
> How can i "write log output to file descriptor n and not to stderr"?
> Please, give me example of use an option "--logger-fd" in Win OS.
That is a matter of the shell. I don't now whether cmd.exe supports
this. We use this gpgme heavily along w
* Christoph Anton Mitterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Christoph Anton Mitterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>do you know of an application that uses this lib?
> >>>
> >>No I don't but that shouldn't be a reason to forget about it,...
> >>
> >Now why is that? I didn't imply anythi
* Dirk Traulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, fortunately in 1.4.3, there will be a 'clean', which does exactly
> what 'clean total' should have done.
Great news, I'm looking forward to it.
--
left blank, right bald
pgpmUqWFaKtPm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
18 matches
Mail list logo