Remco Post wrote:
>> I think that's been fixed in the latest version. Unfortunately, I was
>> busy packaging up 1.4.5 and haven't had chance to look at gpg2 again.
>> I'll try to get a "proper" package for gpg2 done over the next week or so.
> cool, thanks.
Now that v2 has been released, I hope t
Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> It struck me as ironic that OpenPGP isn't that open! I started work on
> an open implementation on a BasicCard but, due to licensing
> restrictions, I am unable to get a card with RSA card built in and
> implementing RSA using the binary left to right method in Basic wi
"Peter S. May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know how the internals of "file" work. If I were trying to get
> a generic file-like program to grok OpenPGP, here's probably how I'd go
> about it:
>
> * If the first non-blank line started "--- BEGIN PGP ", it would
> probably be reasonabl
Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
>
> and the "file" command. Evidently, OpenPGP is totally incompatible
> with that and always will be. At least I can't see a way to make it
> fit. If you can, be my guest. It would require enumerating all of the
> possibilities and putting in ALL of them, but being car
