On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I use the gpg-agent to store my passphrase. The problem is that my
> timeout is set for like 24 hours (actually, now it is 99 seconds
> :) ), but pinentry keeps asking for my password every 4 hours or so.
> How would I get that to work corre
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> What is your reason for no windows port of 2.0 ?
> Is it a business reason ? Or ideological ?
I did a very basic port for a customer 2 years agho. However it is
not maintained (because the custumer didn't entered into a support
contract) and a
Aldert Hazenberg wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
>
>> A port to Windows might
>> eventually be done but as of now I see no reason for it.
>
>
> Hi Werner,
>
> What is your reason for no windows port of 2.0 ?
> Is it a business reason ? Or ideological ?
>
As I unde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Aldert Hazenberg wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
>
>> A port to Windows might
>> eventually be done but as of now I see no reason for it.
> What is your reason for no windows port of 2.0 ?
> Is it a business reason ? Or
On Nov 13, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
A port to Windows might
eventually be done but as of now I see no reason for it.
Hi Werner,
What is your reason for no windows port of 2.0 ?
Is it a business reason ? Or ideological ?
Aldert.
--
Aldert J.B.P. Hazenberg
Email : [EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:28:18 +0100GMT (13-11-2006, 16:28 +0200, where I
live), Werner Koch wrote:
WK> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> I received the notice that 2.0 has been released. I'm currently using
>> GnuPG 1.4.5, which
I use the gpg-agent to store my passphrase. The problem is that my
timeout is set for like 24 hours (actually, now it is 99 seconds
:) ), but pinentry keeps asking for my password every 4 hours or so.
How would I get that to work correctly?
I use Psi v0.10 (which uses GnuPG encryption and the
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:55, Christoph Probst said:
>> I was working on a large number of files (about 300) which I exported from
>> my
>> email client (the result of a key signing party some weeks ago):
>
> BTW, sending public keys encrypted or signed is a bad habit. There i
2006/11/13, Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There is no version of GnuPG 2 for Windows. A port to Windows might
eventually be done but as of now I see no reason for it.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
so, for an installation from scratch, can be installed the new 2.0
version to the place of the o
Hello!
g10 Code GmbH is pleased to announce the availability of the new
software package Scute.
Scute is a PKCS #11 implementation for the OpenPGP card using the
GnuPG 2.0 framework. It allows you to use your OpenPGP card for
client authentication in Mozilla-based web browsers.
Scute is dis
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I received the notice that 2.0 has been released. I'm currently using
> GnuPG 1.4.5, which I downloaded as part of the Gnu for Windows
> package, and GPGshell for Windows 3.52. Can I upgrade to v2.0 without
There is no version of GnuPG 2 for Wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I received the notice that 2.0 has been released. I'm currently using
GnuPG 1.4.5, which I downloaded as part of the Gnu for Windows
package, and GPGshell for Windows 3.52. Can I upgrade to v2.0 without
abandoning GPGshell? Do I need to uninstall the
Werner Koch escribe:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > Usually microcontroller manufacturers (Atmel, Infineon, Samsung...) do
> > include hardware based RNG in their chips, don't they?
>
> You want a chip with a hardware accelerator for RSA. RNG's are not the
> problem.
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> It struck me as ironic that OpenPGP isn't that open! I started work on
OpenPGP is define by RFC2440 and as "open" as any RFC. The OpenPGP
card Speification by Achim Pietig and me is very similar to an RFC.
> an open implementation on a Basic
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Usually microcontroller manufacturers (Atmel, Infineon, Samsung...) do
> include hardware based RNG in their chips, don't they?
You want a chip with a hardware accelerator for RSA. RNG's are not the
problem.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
__
Peter Lebbing wrote:
> I got interested as well and though I understand it, I also see a lot of
> added value in a true Open Source implementation.
Replied off list.
Ben
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
Hello!
The GNU project is pleased to announce the availability of a new
stable GnuPG release: Version 2.0.0.
The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU's tool for secure communication
and data storage. It can be used to encrypt data, create digital
signatures, help authenticating using Secure Shel
Peter Lebbing escribe:
> I got interested as well and though I understand it, I also see a lot of
> added value in a true Open Source implementation. I'm looking into
> implementing it on a general processor microcontroller, I have
> experience with microcontroller programming. The main problem I s
18 matches
Mail list logo
