Re: GnuPG incompatible with windows-vista ?

2007-03-12 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:39:30AM +0100, Sebsatian von Thadden wrote: > Hi, > > today I've made some tests with gnupg and vista. > > Everything works fine, but at the moment, gnupg has to communicate with > any external keyserver, I get this result: > > gpg: searching for "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" fr

Re: display bug

2007-03-12 Thread David Shaw
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:47:37PM +0100, Jørgen Christiansen Lysdal wrote: > When i verify a data signature, isent gpg supposed to show > keyserver url with the result when i have "verify-options > show-keyserver-urls" in gpg.conf? If there is a keyserver URL in the signature. David ___

GnuPG incompatible with windows-vista ?

2007-03-12 Thread Sebsatian von Thadden
Hi, today I've made some tests with gnupg and vista. Everything works fine, but at the moment, gnupg has to communicate with any external keyserver, I get this result: gpg: searching for "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpgkeys: this keyserver type only supports key retrieval

display bug

2007-03-12 Thread Jørgen Christiansen Lysdal
When i verify a data signature, isent gpg supposed to show keyserver url with the result when i have "verify-options show-keyserver-urls" in gpg.conf? -- Jørgen Ch. Lysdal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing li

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X

2007-03-12 Thread Joseph Oreste Bruni
It wouldn't make sense to try to package GPG using a .app bundle since GPG itself will most often be used from the command line. As such, you would need to update your PATH environment variable to include a deep reference to something like "/Applications/GnuPG/ Content/MacOS/gpg" instead of

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X

2007-03-12 Thread Ryan R. LaMothe
It's not a matter of "why not do it yourself" but a matter of "why isn't it being done" kind of question. A graphical installer and uninstaller for the entire suite would be nice. Maybe I will find time to work on it, maybe someone else can too. It is the same kind of question I ask the Mono

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X

2007-03-12 Thread Ryan R. LaMothe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why isn't this application packaged like normal OS X apps in an application bundle? Why the Unix(Linux) bundling and installing? On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > >> I've p

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X

2007-03-12 Thread Ryan R. LaMothe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thank you for your reply. Although not all .app bundles are Cocoa apps, Eclipse is a good example. How difficult would be it be to package this application as a .app bundle instead of all over the filesystem like the typical Unix application (w

gpgsm and multiple messages

2007-03-12 Thread Werner Koch
Hi, I have been asked how the multiple messages problem, published last week, relates to gpgsm and thus S/MIME messages. Well, there is no problem because S/MIME is based on CMS (formerly known as pkcs#7) and CMS is different from OpenPGP concerning the structure of its messages: * CMS is not pa