Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-2
release: Version 2.0.5.
This is maintenance release with a few bug fixes and support for
building for W32 platforms.
The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU's tool for secure communication
and data storage. It can be u
Werner Koch wrote:
> * Switched license to GPLv3.
Why was the license switched to GPLv3? And, who made this decision?
Thanks,
Brian
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Why was the license switched to GPLv3? And, who made this decision?
The FSF towers.
Even without being an FSF copyrighted GNU package I would have done
that. The GPLv3 has some weaknesses but it makes some things clearer
and adjusts for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Werner Koch wrote:
> * Basic support for Windows.
Could you be more specific?
- --
Windows NT 5.1.2600.2180 | Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 | Enigmail 0.95.2 | GPG
1.4.7
Key ID: 0xF88E034060A78FCB - available on major keyservers and upon
request
Fingerpr
Werner Koch wrote:
> Even without being an FSF copyrighted GNU package I would have done
> that.
Speaking of, Werner, I always thought it was a FSF requirement that all
GNU packages have copyright signed over to the FSF. Is GnuPG an
exception to the rule, was some special accomodation reached, wh
On 7/6/07, Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-2
> release: Version 2.0.5.
Hello Werner,
It will be nice if you publish dependency like libassuan and libskba
version requirements (if changed).
Also, you have paral
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Speaking of, Werner, I always thought it was a FSF requirement that all
> GNU packages have copyright signed over to the FSF. Is GnuPG an
> exception to the rule, was some special accomodation reached, what?
Well, not all GNU packages but thos
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> * Basic support for Windows.
> Could you be more specific?
Well, you can run gpgsm and also gpg2 on Windows (tested with XPpro).
gpg-agent is fired up as required, gpg-connect-agent works and we will
eventually also make dirmngr work. scdaem
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> It will be nice if you publish dependency like libassuan and libskba
> version requirements (if changed).
Yeah I know I should have done it. However configure tells you about
this and where to get it. I was pretty busy to release all these ot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alon Bar-Lev wrote the following on 7/6/07 7:32 PM:
[...]
> Hello Werner,
>
> It will be nice if you publish dependency like libassuan and libskba
> version requirements (if changed).
- ---
configure:
*** You need libassuan with Pth support to
On 7/6/07, Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (pinentry 0.7.3, released today). It not stable enough for production
Any more surprises?
BTW: You ignored all patches from:
https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue798
Alon.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
If I run ./configure, it tells me it can only build for w32.
If I run ./autogen.sh --build-w32, it tells me to run make distclean.
If I run make distclean, it tells me there is no rule for distclean
and stops.
- --
Windows NT 5.1.2600.2180 | Thu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
did sombody succeed in cross compiling gnupg 1.4-series on a PPC-Mac for
an Intel Mac? (both run Mac OS X 10.4.10)?
If yes, what would I have to consider? Any specific configure-switches?
TIA
Ludwig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuP
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 11:12:53PM +0200, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did sombody succeed in cross compiling gnupg 1.4-series on a PPC-Mac for
> an Intel Mac? (both run Mac OS X 10.4.10)?
>
> If yes, what would I have to consider? Any specific configure-switches?
It's in the README:
14 matches
Mail list logo