Someone to whom I had recently sent my public key just called me to verify
the Fingerprint of my key, created with gpg4win-1.1.3. I chose my key pair
in the Windows privacy Tray and double clicked on it to tell him the
fingerprint, and he confirmed it. The guy then told me Now let's check the
What do i have to pass to gpg to work on a read-only filesystem and a
homedir which is not available? Meaning to be forced to not create
anything except messages on stdout and stderr and to be forced to not
read anything except the key i want to decrypt.
I tried passing the switches --keyring
Sorry Sir,
unfortunaltely I cannot download the patched gpg.exe. May You help me?
Thanks
--
Hermann F. Schulze
Obere Waldstr. 13
D-42929 Wermelskirchen
FON: +49-2196-95460
MOBIL: +49-177-88-27788
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bank:Volksbank RS-SG
BLZ: 340 600 94
KTO: 930 875
-
Hi!
Quite some tima ago a have seen Spams with a (obviously bogus) ---BEGIN
PGP SIGNATURE--- + garbage part at the end of the mails.
This might have had negative influence on some Bayesian databases.
Apart from creating a special Spamassassin module which actually
verifies incoming emails, I
All,
after updating to openSuse 10.3 I tried to rebuild a project
that uses libgcrypt as a shared library. Using 10.2 I had no
problems so far. When linking my own shared library I get the
following error message from libtool:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE
Sorry I don't know much about this as I am just beginning, but what are the
dangers if you submit your key to a keyserver and make at available to the
public?
I am aware that users who want to communicate with me securely can import my
key from a keyserver and add it to their keyring. But I want
christopher dubois wrote:
Sorry I don't know much about this as I am just beginning, but what are the
dangers if you submit your key to a keyserver and make at available to the
public?
Short answer: dwarfed by the benefits is the best answer.
Long answer: there's a marginal risk of increased
Pitigrilli wrote:
I thought that there is only one fingerprint and that this would be
sufficient to confirm the integrity of the public key. Can any please
provide me with some information? Thanks, Pitigrilli
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --fingerprint --fingerprint --list-key 0x5b8709eb
pub
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:39:04AM -0700, christopher dubois wrote:
Sorry I don't know much about this as I am just beginning, but what are the
dangers if you submit your key to a keyserver and make at available to the
public?
When you submit your key to a keyserver, you only submit the
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:45:56PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, David Shaw wrote:
Or to be more accurate, you DO have a key for encryption, but the
keyserver isn't storing it. This is a well-known keyserver bug with
the pksd keyserver software,
Out of curiosity, what
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 05:47:51AM -0700, Pitigrilli wrote:
Someone to whom I had recently sent my public key just called me to verify
the Fingerprint of my key, created with gpg4win-1.1.3. I chose my key pair
in the Windows privacy Tray and double clicked on it to tell him the
fingerprint,
Hi!
Pitigrilli schrieb:
I thought that there is only one fingerprint and that this would be
sufficient to confirm the integrity of the public key.
All your subkeys are signed by your primary key (see gpg --list-sigs,
the lines with sig after each sub line).
Therefore, verifying the fingerprints
Thanks in advance for any information from any Mac user or Mac developer
that has already tested GnuPG, and gpg2, as well as Thunderbird+Enigmail
under the new operating system.
I have read that users of PGP (PGP Corporation) expect unpleasant surprises.
Charly
Charly Avital wrote:
Thanks in advance for any information from any Mac user or Mac developer
that has already tested GnuPG, and gpg2, as well as Thunderbird+Enigmail
under the new operating system.
I will eat my own hat if GnuPG has any problems whatsoever with Leopard.
From all that I know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
I will eat my own hat if GnuPG has any problems whatsoever with
Leopard. From all that I know of Leopard, GnuPG will continue to
work just fine.
I will be getting Leopard very soon after release. If there are
any
At 2:26 PM -0500 10/22/07, Andrew Berg wrote:
However, we should should have a vote for recipes,
with the winning recipe being the one you'd use.
Somebody break out the Bass-o-Matic '76's (no, not *that* Bass-o-Matic)
rag-trade cousin, the fabulous Hat-o-Matic 2000 or H2K, to its friends...
Not
16 matches
Mail list logo
