Hello Bahman !
Bahman Movaqar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now my question is:
> Since all of the keys are for the same email address, how can I remove
> redundant keys and leave out only one?
Unfortunately, as soon as you don't own the secret key any more, you don't
have the ability to ch
On 2007-11-22 Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Bahman Movaqar wrote:
> > Is it possible to set an expiry date for them?
>
> Not in your case. You would need the private key.
>
> The moral of the story is to generate revocation certificates at the
> same time you generate your keys, test your keys to m
Bahman Movaqar wrote:
> Is it possible to set an expiry date for them?
Not in your case. You would need the private key.
The moral of the story is to generate revocation certificates at the
same time you generate your keys, test your keys to make sure they are
exactly what you need, and create b
On 2007-11-22 Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Bahman Movaqar wrote:
> > Now my question is:
> > Since all of the keys are for the same email address, how can I
> > remove redundant keys and leave out only one?
>
> You don't. This isn't possible.
Is it possible to set an expiry date for them?
--
Bah
Bahman Movaqar wrote:
> Now my question is:
> Since all of the keys are for the same email address, how can I remove
> redundant keys and leave out only one?
You don't. This isn't possible.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://list
Hi all,
I, mistakenly, generated several keys, sent them to 'subkeys.pgp.net'
and deleted the ~/.gnupg directory while I _had not_ generated a
revocation certificate for any of those keys except one.
Now my question is:
Since all of the keys are for the same email address, how can I remove
redund
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Robert D. wrote:
> thank you for the help. I have relayed it to my friend. Mind you,
> she's off again to her family and I am unable to watch the
> "repairs" first hand.
There's also another way to handle it that I forgot to mention. If you
have
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am using the binary version of GPG for Windows, version 1.47.
> Everything works fine, but I have a need to automatically decrypt
> files through a script. The hangup that I have right now is that I
> need to decrypt multiple files and se
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Without --homedir won't it try to access the running user home directory?
Yeah, it might create a ~/.gnupg. I applied the fix.
> You should put the ru man page at:
> /usr/man//man[1-9lno]
Okay, I need to see how this can be done with automak
