On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 03:37:37PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If the recipient's mailer supports PGP/MIME, this is of course a way
better solution than any form of traditional inline PGP. All
charsets are then cleanly usable, without any
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The basic assumption is that a key signing is good and that
you actually gain something from it.
That is the assumption that I am challenging.
You are not challengging the assumption, you are attacking the
Hi!
Am Freitag, den 29.02.2008, 15:10 -0500 schrieb Maury Markowitz:
O:\Utilitiesecho o:\apricing\pass.txt | ...
Try type o:\apricing\pass.txt | ... if you really want to do it this
way.
cu, Sven
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org