On Jul 31, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Nicholas Cole wrote:
Dear List,
A quick question about key generation using --batch --key-gen.
Am I right using the option --openpgp, a DSA2 key can be created
just by using
Key-Type: DSA
and a key-size longer than 1024. I.e. there is no specific Key-Type
for
Dear List,
A quick question about key generation using --batch --key-gen.
Am I right using the option --openpgp, a DSA2 key can be created just by using
Key-Type: DSA
and a key-size longer than 1024. I.e. there is no specific Key-Type
for DSA2 keys?
Or is it the case that if DSA2 keys are ena
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Faramir wrote:
> the files in my computer, so if it is just matter to overwrite them with
> the newer ones, that would be easy... but I am not sure if GPG2 uses
> some of these files too... if it does, then I risk breaking it if I just
> overwrite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Well, I have been using gpg 1.4.9 for a some months, and I am quite
happy with it. But I would like to try GnuPG 2, and since I am on
windows, I have to use gpg4win (since it is really unlikely I am going
to compile it myself). But gpg4win comes with
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:26:07 -0400 "Robert J. Hansen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> you might try using the latest version of pgp 8.x
>> (available at zedz)
>
>As I understand it, PGP 8's license agreement does not allow for
>it to
>be hosted anywhere other than pgp.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> you might try using the latest version of pgp 8.x
> (available at zedz)
As I understand it, PGP 8's license agreement does not allow for it to
be hosted anywhere other than pgp.com. This means that obtaining it
from zedz is a copyright violation, and probably should not
vedaal at hush.com vedaal at hush.com
wrote on Thu Jul 31 16:04:22 CEST 2008 :
sandra.de.groot at nl.abnamro.com sandra.de.groot at nl.abnamro.com
wrote on Thu Jul 31 14:12:42 CEST 2008 ; ---^^^
>you might try using the latest version of pgp 8.x
>(available at zedz)
sorry,
forgot
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:13:04PM -0700, SatishK wrote:
>
> We have just installed gnupg-1.4.8 on Sparc/Solaris 10. Is it possible to use
> gpg to encrypt a file using private key and passphrase (under program
> control) and send it to a remote user ? The remote user should be able to
> decrypt t
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> We have just installed gnupg-1.4.8 on Sparc/Solaris 10. Is it possible to use
> gpg to encrypt a file using private key and passphrase (under program
Yes:
gpg -cer [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo
While decrypting gpg ask you forthe passphrase if the
sandra.de.groot at nl.abnamro.com sandra.de.groot at nl.abnamro.com
wrote on Thu Jul 31 14:12:42 CEST 2008 ;
>is the GnuPG 1.4.7 version working with PGP 6.5.2?
it can be,
but only if the gnupg user uses the option of
'--pgp6'
>One of our customers is using GnuPG 1.4.7
>and we are using PGP 6
On Jul 31, 2008, at 8:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good afternoon,
I am having a question is the GnuPG 1.4.7 version working with PGP
6.5.2?
One of our customers is using GnuPG 1.4.7 and we are using PGP
6.5.2 and
now we got problems with decrypting the message?
Could you please te
Hi!
We are pleased to announce the availability of Dirmngr version 1.0.2.
Dirmngr is a server for managing and downloading certificate
revocation lists (CRLs) for X.509 certificates and for downloading the
certificates themselves. Dirmngr also handles OCSP requests as an
alternative to CRLs. Al
Good afternoon,
I am having a question is the GnuPG 1.4.7 version working with PGP 6.5.2?
One of our customers is using GnuPG 1.4.7 and we are using PGP 6.5.2 and
now we got problems with decrypting the message?
Could you please tell me if both versions are working with each other?
Thank you
We have just installed gnupg-1.4.8 on Sparc/Solaris 10. Is it possible to use
gpg to encrypt a file using private key and passphrase (under program
control) and send it to a remote user ? The remote user should be able to
decrypt the file with the public key sent by us.
Will appreciate clarificat
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> GPG/MIME and S/MIME are two different approaches.
The name is PGP/MIME (rfc3156).
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
p.s. Michael, please check your mail configuration: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
does not make much sense.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
