-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jack Kaye escribió:
> gpg -r -se
>
> But when I sign it this way, it just seems to take the first key in my
> keyring.
> I have generated different public keys to send to different people and
> would like
> to sign the encrypted file with a key
On Sep 10, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Jack Kaye wrote:
Greetings all,
I have what is probably a very basic question but for some reason I
can't seem
to find the answer anywhere online and was hoping one of you GnuPG
boffins could
assist here.
I am trying to digitally sign a file as I encrypt it.
The e
Thanks David!
- Jack
> -Original Message-
> From: David Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:45 PM
> To: Jack Kaye
> Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: Re: Basic file signing question
>
> On Sep 10, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Jack Kaye wrote:
>
> > Greeting
Greetings all,
I have what is probably a very basic question but for some reason I
can't seem
to find the answer anywhere online and was hoping one of you GnuPG
boffins could
assist here.
I am trying to digitally sign a file as I encrypt it.
The encryption part is easy:
gpg -r -e
Signing it
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Sven Radde wrote:
. . .
Am Montag, den 08.09.2008, 19:40 -0500 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
The conversation we're not having, which I think we should be having, is
"how can we have trusted communications on a hostile network when we
don't know if we really control our own PCs
On Sep 10, 2008, at 2:12 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
keyservers are hkp://pgp.mit.edu:11371 and ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
Do not use these keyservers: They are broken. Use keys.gnupg.net,
another round-robin keyserver address or use one specific SKS server.
It is true that pgp.mit.edu is broken (i
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> ---
> gpg --output doc.sig --detach-sig doc
> ---
We do this all the time with GPGME. It is the basic operation you need
for PGP/MIME:
-- Function: gpgme_error_t gpgme_op_sign (gpgme_ctx_t CTX,
gpgme_data_t PLAIN, gpgme_data_t SIG,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I have now enter the following key-servers:
Use only one.
> ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
Don't use this one because it does not syncronize with the other servers
and sends annoying messages around.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Linux-Kongress
Hi!
I am sorry for posting this message both on the devel and users mailing
lists but I am not sure where a question related to GPGME should be
posted.
I am involved in a project that (on top of other things) has to sign PDF
documents. We are trying to sign PDF documents using gpg. It's very easy
Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 09:52 +0200 schrieb Werner Koch:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jef/P9RwlwTKEY2s8979"
>
> You can't feed a PGP/MIME message to gpg; gpg d
Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 09:48 +0200 schrieb Werner Koch:
could you be please more precise ;-)
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > cat test3
> [...]
> > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jef/P9RwlwTKE
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jef/P9RwlwTKEY2s8979"
You can't feed a PGP/MIME message to gpg; gpg does (on purpose) not
feature a MIME parse. Your MUA (mail program) has co
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> cat test3
[...]
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jef/P9RwlwTKEY2s8979"
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2
> Date: Fri, 20 Jun
13 matches
Mail list logo
