Robert J. Hansen wrote:
This deputy sheriff reported to his superior, and I wound up
with a thirty-day delay in the paperwork while the county sheriff made
sure that I didn't have murder afoot. Were they overreacting? Sure,a
bit. But they were also doing their job.
They could have been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jorgen Christiansen Lysdal wrote:
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
This deputy sheriff reported to his superior, and I wound up
with a thirty-day delay in the paperwork while the county sheriff made
sure that I didn't have murder afoot. Were they
Hi!
Although David's awesome little tool [1] reduces the chance of losing a
secret key, I am still a fan for pre-generated revocation certificates
in case a key is irrecoverably lost.
David, is there a chance that you will extend paperkey so that it
encodes and decodes revocation certificates?
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 21:40 +0200, Sven Radde wrote:
David, is there a chance that you will extend paperkey so that it
encodes and decodes revocation certificates?
I'm not David (obviously), but I don't see the win here.
The problem with paper copies of private keys is they're big. If
there's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello!
[1] For those that might not know:
http://www.jabberwocky.com/software/paperkey/
Well, I didn't know about that tool. I was thinking about backing up
the secret keys in a printed paper, but I discarded the idea because I
thought it was
On Oct 5, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Faramir wrote:
[1] For those that might not know:
http://www.jabberwocky.com/software/paperkey/
Well, I didn't know about that tool. I was thinking about backing up
the secret keys in a printed paper, but I discarded the idea because I
thought it was infeasible (I
On Oct 5, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Sven Radde wrote:
Although David's awesome little tool [1] reduces the chance of
losing a
secret key, I am still a fan for pre-generated revocation certificates
in case a key is irrecoverably lost.
David, is there a chance that you will extend paperkey so that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw escribió:
...
that much that can be removed. Luckily revocation certificates are
pretty short to begin with. The only real advantage that paperkey could
bring to revocation certificates is the per-line CRC, which makes
retyping
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw escribió:
On Oct 5, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Faramir wrote:
http://www.jabberwocky.com/software/paperkey/
...
1.- If I use the tool in ubuntu, and then I open the output text file in
windows (to print it), will I have problems with
Faramir wrote:
1.- If I use the tool in ubuntu, and then I open the output text file in
windows (to print it), will I have problems with charsets? Maybe the
solution would be to convert the txt to a pdf file, before moving it to
windows...
Should only 7bit characters Charset shouldn't be an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John Clizbe escribió:
Grab the archive and extract it. Move to the top level directory and
configure make make install. I just built it on Windows under MSYS with
the MinGW compiler.
Windows version? Maybe, if David Shaw is not opposed, you
On Oct 5, 2008, at 8:11 PM, Faramir wrote:
* The file format is now included as part of the base16 output, as
there is no guarantee that this program will be on-hand when a
reconstruction is necessary. The format can also be displayed
via the --file-format command. Suggested
On Oct 5, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Faramir wrote:
John Clizbe escribió:
Grab the archive and extract it. Move to the top level directory and
configure make make install. I just built it on Windows under
MSYS with
the MinGW compiler.
Windows version? Maybe, if David Shaw is not opposed, you
Hi!
Am Sonntag, den 05.10.2008, 17:50 -0400 schrieb Faramir:
2.- Well... I am really newbie with ubuntu (I am starting to think I am
a noob in ubuntu, since time is passing, and I am not improving at all),
so I have some doubts about how to install the tool in ubuntu...
It's in the
14 matches
Mail list logo
