Initial testing (I encrypted a few files symmetrically using 3DES) shows
that Werner's generic build is actually faster. Werner, which version of
gcc do you use (or do you use something else?)?
I used gcc 3.4.5 (anything higher for Windows is in alpha or
experimental AFAIK). Correct me if I'm
Andrew Berg wrote:
Initial testing (I encrypted a few files symmetrically using 3DES) shows
that Werner's generic build is actually faster. Werner, which version of
gcc do you use (or do you use something else?)?
I used gcc 3.4.5 (anything higher for Windows is in alpha or
experimental
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
WK has posted several times to the list that the canonical supported build
system for Windows is a Linux-based cross-compile.
Let's say: Using a POSIX based cross-compile;-).
It just happens that I use Debian and that you can simply do an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Before reinstalling my operating system on this computer, I saved my
.gnupg folder. After the reinstall, I copied over the folder to
my home directory. My secret key was recognized, just fine, but
I did not have the corresponding public key.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:10:07PM -0500, Tim Sally wrote:
Hello,
Before reinstalling my operating system on this computer, I saved my
.gnupg folder. After the reinstall, I copied over the folder to
my home directory. My secret key was recognized, just fine, but
I did not have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
Another difference that I have noticed is that sometimes FireGPG
notifies me that a message I have signed is not valid. That
seems strange to me because: (a) it only happens intermittently and
(b) FireGPG is the
