-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello Werewolf !
Werewolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been trying find references on net etc
Is there way to set which digest mode gpg uses for clear signed messages
depending on which uid is set as the primary?? Tried edited the uid
with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Werewolf escribió:
Been trying find references on net etc
Is there way to set which digest mode gpg uses for clear signed messages
depending on which uid is set as the primary?? Tried edited the uid
with setpref S9 S8 S7 S3 S2 H8 H3 H9 H10 Z2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Faramir wrote:
Werewolf escribió:
Been trying find references on net etc
Is there way to set which digest mode gpg uses for clear signed messages
depending on which uid is set as the primary?? Tried edited the uid
with setpref S9 S8 S7 S3 S2 H8
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:53:06PM -0400, Werewolf wrote:
That brings up query for using Engimail with ThunderbirdPortable. It
want the gpg binaries in Apps/gpg dir and the keyrings in Data/gpg. Am
I to assume the gpg.conf should be with the keyrings (Data/gpg)?
That is the common setup.
Hello,
it is possible to send email in the background when I use the internal
SMTP feature?
Thomas
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 20:57, Thu 23 Oct 08, Thomas Bohn wrote:
it is possible to send email in the background when I use the internal
SMTP feature?
This was the wrong mailing list, I apologize.
Thomas
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Secondly I wonder if since my key is 1024 bit DSA that limits the algo
usable to say sha1, md5, etc? Saw a note about --enable-dsa2 option,
not all applications support this yet. Given latency of the net; is this
note still very relevant or just slight relevant?
Your question is not very
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
A: Depends on who you correspond with. There are still a lot of PGP 6
installs out there.
6.5.8 seems popular. Any idea why?
--
Key ID: 0xF88E034060A78FCB
Fingerprint: 4A84 CAE2 A0D3 2AEB 71F6 07FD F88E 0340 60A7 8FCB
Windows NT 6.0.6001.18145 | GPG 1.4.9 |
Andrew Berg wrote:
6.5.8 seems popular. Any idea why?
It was the last version of PGP to be released freeware for UNIX. To
this day, PGP has more brand recognition than GnuPG; people who only
know I need PGP to do $foo will more often than not look around for
PGP for UNIX and find 6.5.8.
On the
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Andrew Berg wrote:
6.5.8 seems popular. Any idea why?
It was the last version of PGP to be released freeware for UNIX.
Ah.
PGP 6.5.8, like PGP 2.6, is good enough for most people and purposes.
Which means that no matter how much we want to get rid of them, they
Andrew Berg wrote:
Isn't 2.6 over 10 years old? Is it even compatible with the Windows NT
kernel?
Try fifteen or more -- and yes, it is. It's a very, _very_ simple piece
of software; it'll compile anywhere that's even faintly, vaguely, making
noises about being POSIX conformant. Such as, say,
Who was behind the pgp 6.5.8 ckt release? That seemed like a solid
piece of software at the time. If your were using windows, it
provided a good tray interface, and made encryption/decryption very
easy. How does this piece of antiquated software compare to modern
day gnupg as far as ciphers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Secondly I wonder if since my key is 1024 bit DSA that limits the algo
usable to say sha1, md5, etc? Saw a note about --enable-dsa2 option,
not all applications support this yet. Given latency of the net; is this
note
13 matches
Mail list logo
