Hiya gang,
Sorry for being redundant, but what are some good keyservers to use? The
ones that are on a stock Kgpg setup don't seem to work too well.
Thanks
--
As the Founding Fathers knew well, a government that does not trust its
honest, law-abiding, taxpaying citizens with the means
Brian wrote:
> I tried this command:
> gpg -K
>
> gog.exe crashed and the command line window give this info:
> gpg: checking the trustdb
> Assertion failed: keyblock->pkt->pkttype == PKT_PUBLIC_KEY, file
> keyring.c, line
> 1387
>
> This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Brian wrote:
> I removed everything and rebooted. Then went and installed just the
> command line component. The version shows as 1.4.9 and the path
> variable is correct.
>
> I tried this command:
> gpg -K
>
> gog.exe crashed and the command lin
skl99...@gmx.net (02.02.2009 23:25):
> Hello,
>
> is there a possibility to have gpg2 make a detached cleartext
> signature? I only seem to be able to have it do either the one or the
> other.
gpg --armor --detach-sign --sign
> And the more complex follow on question for all the crypto experts
>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 06:25:38PM +0100, skl99...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a possibility to have gpg2 make a detached cleartext
> signature? I only seem to be able to have it do either the one or
> the other.
What do you mean by a detached cleartext signature? A detached
signature
Hello,
is there a possibility to have gpg2 make a detached cleartext signature? I only
seem to be able to have it do either the one or the other.
And the more complex follow on question for all the crypto experts out there:
the reason why I want to do that is because I would like to timestamp s
John Clizbe wrote:
Brian wrote:
I downloaded 1.4.9 and installed it. I then grabbed WinPT and when
launching WinPT, I get repeated gpg.exe crashes, like I did before.
I also downloaded GnuPT and installed that, which comes with 1.4.9 and
running that also causes gpg.exe crashes.
I then too
John Clizbe wrote:
> Brian wrote:
>> I downloaded 1.4.9 and installed it. I then grabbed WinPT and when
>> launching WinPT, I get repeated gpg.exe crashes, like I did before.
>>
>> I also downloaded GnuPT and installed that, which comes with 1.4.9 and
>> running that also causes gpg.exe crashes.
Werner Koch schrieb:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:27, wolfg...@rosenauer.org said:
>
>> scdaemon[18495.0] DBG: <- READCERT OPENPGP.1
>> 2009-01-30 22:24:17 scdaemon[18495] app_readcert failed: Nicht
>> unterstützte Verarbeitungsaufgabe
>> scdaemon[18495.0] DBG: -> ERR 100663420 Nicht unterstützte
>> V
On Feb 2, 2009, at 4:45 AM, Sven Radde wrote:
Hi GnuPG-Users!
Is there anywhere a list of notations that do currently have any
kind of
"canonical" meaning (or, rather, are interpreted by GnuPG and/or
popular
MUAs in any way)?
I found out about "pka-adr...@gnupg.org=..." and a quite old no
Hi GnuPG-Users!
Is there anywhere a list of notations that do currently have any kind of
"canonical" meaning (or, rather, are interpreted by GnuPG and/or popular
MUAs in any way)?
I found out about "pka-adr...@gnupg.org=..." and a quite old notation
that tells the commercial PGP about PGP/MIME cap
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:27, wolfg...@rosenauer.org said:
> scdaemon[18495.0] DBG: <- READCERT OPENPGP.1
> 2009-01-30 22:24:17 scdaemon[18495] app_readcert failed: Nicht
> unterstützte Verarbeitungsaufgabe
> scdaemon[18495.0] DBG: -> ERR 100663420 Nicht unterstützte
> Verarbeitungsaufgabe
There is
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:19, ramon.loure...@upf.edu said:
> but where is the info for --list-sigs ?
It is also in DETAILS.
Please consider to use gpgme as that library makes it much easier to
access the output of gpg. For example there is a documented structure
for key signatures (see below) an
Hi,
please move future message threads to the gnupg-devel@ list. Longer
technical discussions on gnupg-users@ are not appropriate.
Thanks,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnup
14 matches
Mail list logo
