Philip wrote:
> Hi
> I have some questions about gpg
> 1. using gpg command line, can I pass data to be encrypted to gpg that
> isn't in a file? For example if I want to encrypt "Mary had a little
> lamb" to a an asc file but I don't want to put that text onto the hard
> drive unencrypted first.
Hi
I have some questions about gpg
1. using gpg command line, can I pass data to be encrypted to gpg that
isn't in a file? For example if I want to encrypt "Mary had a little
lamb" to a an asc file but I don't want to put that text onto the hard
drive unencrypted first.
2. is there something lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Robert J. Hansen escribió:
> John W. Moore III wrote:
>> Riddle Me this, Robert; _if_ "The Customer" has a requirement that
>> 3DES must be used [and they are associating it with their Key] then
>> wouldn't this mean that the *only* preference broadc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Robert J. Hansen escribió:
> Smith, Cathy wrote:
>> The customer said they have a proprietary implementation that only
>> supports Blowfish or 3DES for the key. I'm still trying to find out
>> exactly what that means.
>
> Okay, that much makes sens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John W. Moore III escribió:
...
> Riddle Me this, Robert; _if_ "The Customer" has a requirement that 3DES
> must be used [and they are associating it with their Key] then wouldn't
> this mean that the *only* preference broadcast by their Key is 3DES?
John W. Moore III wrote:
> Riddle Me this, Robert; _if_ "The Customer" has a requirement that
> 3DES must be used [and they are associating it with their Key] then
> wouldn't this mean that the *only* preference broadcast by their Key
> is 3DES?
You're assuming the customer's key is correctly adve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Smith, Cathy wrote:
>> The customer said they have a proprietary implementation that only
>> supports Blowfish or 3DES for the key. I'm still trying to find out
>> exactly what that means.
>
> Okay, that much makes sense n
Thanks. I'll try that.
Cathy
---
Cathy L. Smith
Engineer
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Operated by Battelle for the
U.S. Department of Energy
Phone: 509.375.2687
Fax: 509.375.2330
Email: cathy.sm...@pnl.gov
-Original Message-
From: Robert J. Hansen [mailto:r...@
Smith, Cathy wrote:
> The customer said they have a proprietary implementation that only
> supports Blowfish or 3DES for the key. I'm still trying to find out
> exactly what that means.
Okay, that much makes sense now.
I would suggest adding:
cipher-algo 3DES
... to your .gnupg/gpg.conf file.
I agree that with the lack of understanding. It's been difficult to get
specific information from the customer. I don't have the option of
saying it's their problem. The GnuPG was a guess after I read something
about specifying the cipher algorithm.
The customer said they have a proprietary i
Smith, Cathy wrote:
> The customer stated that he can accept a public key generated with
> either Blowfish or Triple-DES. I wasn't sure what he needed because all
> I've dealt with in generating a key pair before is selecting the DSA or
> RSA option. Our PGP version doesn't offer the DSA and Elga
The customer stated that he can accept a public key generated with
either Blowfish or Triple-DES. I wasn't sure what he needed because all
I've dealt with in generating a key pair before is selecting the DSA or
RSA option. Our PGP version doesn't offer the DSA and Elgamal option.
I've sent him
Smith, Cathy wrote:
> Is there a brief explanation available as to how the cipher is used in
> generating the private/public keys? It seems this is separate from the
> cipher that is chosen to encrypt my data.
r...@chronicles:~$ gpg --enable-dsa2 --gen-key
Please select what kind of key you want
Is there a brief explanation available as to how the cipher is used in
generating the private/public keys? It seems this is separate from the
cipher that is chosen to encrypt my data.
Thanks.
Cathy
---
Cathy L. Smith
Engineer
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Operated by Battelle for th
"Smith, Cathy" wrote on
Date: 2009-05-01 16:08:44 :
>I have a customer who can not accept our pgp public key.
>They are asking for a specific cipher to be used in generating the
public key.
this sounds like there might be a 'problem' ...
there are people who 'can' use 'any' cipher, but pref
My apologies to the group. I meant to say
gpg --gen-key
I have a customer who can not accept our pgp public key. They are
asking for a specific cipher to be used in generating the public key.
After some reading yesterday, it seemed that gpg might be the solution.
I don't have any
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, David Shaw wrote:
http://eurocrypt2009rump.cr.yp.to/837a0a8086fa6ca714249409ddfae43d.pdf
There is not much hard information yet, but the two big quotes are
"SHA-1 collisions now 2^52" and "Practical collisions are within
resources of a well funded organisation."
17 matches
Mail list logo