On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 10:27, mani...@gmail.com said:
Do we increase risk (risk of attacks, risk of errors etc ) by using front
ends ?
That is hard to tell. Every extra line of code adds the risk of a new
error; thus frontends are risky. However, most errors are due to user
errors and thus a
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:52, malte.g...@gmx.de said:
Does the GPG4Win package support the GnuPG smartcard? Of course, given there
is a reader and its driver installed first...
Yes.
And, how powerful is the Claws client? Does it support multiple pop, smtp
accounts and IMAP?
The German c't
Werner Koch schrieb:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:52, malte.g...@gmx.de said:
Does the GPG4Win package support the GnuPG smartcard? Of course, given there
is a reader and its driver installed first...
Yes.
Indeed, GPG4Win works very smoothly.
And, how powerful is the Claws client? Does it
On Monday 08 June 2009, Werner Koch wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:52, malte.g...@gmx.de said:
Does the GPG4Win package support the GnuPG smartcard? Of course,
given there is a reader and its driver installed first...
Yes.
And, how powerful is the Claws client? Does it support multiple
Hi, I'm pretty new to gpg and openpgp, but I have been using it casually
for a while to encrypt things occasionally. I have a question about
something that happened with an old set of keys, stored in a pgp .asc
file created by a windows version of pgp 8.1. The .asc file basically
contains armor
Hi
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Robert J. Hansen - r...@sixdemonbag.org
+gpg2+maniams+ba4eefb302.rjh#sixdemonbag@spamgourmet.com wrote:
reynt0 wrote:
I'm a litle late commenting, but I think it's worth noting
in this discussion that any security improvement(s) may be
useful even
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Werner Koch - w...@gnupg.org
+gpg2+maniams+381edcc67a.wk#gnupg@spamgourmet.com wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:52, malte.g...@gmx.de said:
Does the GPG4Win package support the GnuPG smartcard? Of course, given
there is a reader and its driver installed
