-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Steven W. Orr wrote:
> He was sending text and html as separate attachments. For reasons that are
> not completely clear to me, I was able to verify and decrypt the message from
> inside Thunderbird/Enigma by selecting: View->Message Body As->Plain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/01/09 15:01, quoth Steven W. Orr:
> I got my friend to install WinPT which seems to include GnuPG. He created his
> keypair. He received my key and signed my key. He sent me my key back and he
> also sent me his key which I then signed and sent b
Hi!
I am using the OpenPGP Card with a "Gemplus GemPC Twin 00 00" smart card
adapter and it works fine with gnupg 1. But gnupg 2 does not find my
smart card adapter and tells me "OpenPGP Karte ist nicht vorhanden:
Umbekanntes IPC Kommando" (OpenPGP card ist not available: unknown IPC
command). My s
On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
Hello,
its more a curiosity for me now, but I remember one university
lecturer
saying, that successful quantum computer would make public key
cryptography
useless. Some experiment here:
http://www.physorg.com/news165418586.html
Opinions on
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> Opinions on if we are likely to experience it, the public key demise?
Our largest superpositional computer can store about five qubits. We'd
need to hit about 5000 qubits before public key cryptography would be in
trouble, and about 1 qubits before it would be in a lot
Hello,
its more a curiosity for me now, but I remember one university lecturer
saying, that successful quantum computer would make public key cryptography
useless. Some experiment here:
http://www.physorg.com/news165418586.html
Opinions on if we are likely to experience it, the public key demise?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I got my friend to install WinPT which seems to include GnuPG. He created his
keypair. He received my key and signed my key. He sent me my key back and he
also sent me his key which I then signed and sent back to him. So far, so good.
When he tried to
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:15 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> Not a bug or a problem. OpenPGP keys can be represented in many different,
> but functionally equivalent, ways. Different keyservers may choose
> different packet length types, etc. In your particular case, it looks like
> they just chose diff
On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Matt Gantner wrote:
Hello.
I have uploaded my public key (GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin)) via command
line and copy / paste methods into keys.gnupg.net and pgpkeys.mit.edu
and when I look up the key on the systems they are different. I have
been looking at this problem for a
Hello.
I have uploaded my public key (GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin)) via command
line and copy / paste methods into keys.gnupg.net and pgpkeys.mit.edu
and when I look up the key on the systems they are different. I have
been looking at this problem for a few days and uploading my keys to
servers. So far
10 matches
Mail list logo
