On Wed Sep 02 2009 01:04:28 GMT-0400 (EST) , Werner Koch
wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:57, ha...@hawkesnest.net said:
>
>> I think it may still be a problem that attempting to turn off all
>> the flags has the actual effect of turning them all on instead...
>
> That is per OpenPGP: Key flags
Charly Avital wrote:
> Thank you Robert.
I did builds for only a very brief period of time: once he got 1.4.7
packages built, I stopped. He does a great job with MacGPG, and I've
got no desire to duplicate work that's already being done well.
Thanks, Benjamin, for all your work. The Mac users r
2009/9/2 Bob Wyatt :
> After doing a CFLAGS=”-g -02 –mcpu=powerpc” ./configure, the following is
> reported:
I think you mentioned that pthreads was installed under /usr/local/ try:
./configure --with-pth-prefix=/usr/local/
For further options, take a look at ./configure --help
Ben
__
After doing a CFLAGS="-g -02 -mcpu=powerpc" ./configure, the following is
reported:
configure: WARNING: pthread.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: pthread.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: pthread.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure
I am boldly trying to get GnuPG 2.0.12 installed, even though I don't really
need S/MIME or desktop support.
So while this request for help festers a bit, I will download the 1.4
version and see if I can get that to go.
When I configure GnuPG 2.0.12, it tells me that linassuan-1.0.4 (minimum)
2009/9/2 Robert J. Hansen :
> Can we get an #ifdef for Darwin to replace the ASM blocks with compiled
> code?
I tested it as part of my Universal Binary build, and the ASM blocks
make little difference with fast processors.
Ben
___
Gnupg-users mailing
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:07, ds...@gefira.pl said:
> However, I cannot decrypt a message encrypted with a 3072b key, also
> generated on-card. I'm 100% sure I'm entering a correct PIN but still
I can confirm that. It seems there are actually two problems: One bug
in gpg and afaics a bug in the car
Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-1
release: Version 1.4.10.
The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU's tool for secure communication
and data storage. It is a complete and free replacement of PGP and
can be used to encrypt data and to create digital sign
On Wednesday, September 02, 2009, at 08:18AM, "David Shaw"
wrote:
>
>No mass sign ability, but you can do some shell magic like:
>
>for i in (the keyids here)
>do
> gpg -u XX --lsign $i
>done
>
>This assumes you don't have a passphrase on the key (otherwise you'd
>have to type it multip
On Sep 1, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Seidl, Scott wrote:
We use gnupg in an automated mode within the organization to encrypt/
decrypt documents exchanged between companies. The Key Pair we have
is expiring soon and I am replacing it with a new key pair. This
new key would be provided to the other
On Sep 2, 2009, at 12:47 AM, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
I tried compiling 1.4.10rc1 on Mac OS X 10.6 without success.
10.6 ships with a newer version of the compiler toolchain that is
giving a few headaches here and there. Until we work out the issue,
just compile with --disable-asm.
Da
Charly Avital wrote the following on 9/2/09 9:14 AM:
> Robert J. Hansen wrote the following on 3/6/07 10:06 AM:
>> I've taken the liberty of packaging up 1.4.7 for OS X. (I apologize
>> to Benjamin if I'm stepping on his toes here; by my recollection,
>> he's doing packages for 2.0.x, not 1.4.x, s
Robert J. Hansen wrote the following on 3/6/07 10:06 AM:
> I've taken the liberty of packaging up 1.4.7 for OS X. (I apologize
> to Benjamin if I'm stepping on his toes here; by my recollection,
> he's doing packages for 2.0.x, not 1.4.x, so I _should_ be safe.)
I believe you are.
>
Using the r
> I tried compiling 1.4.10rc1 on Mac OS X 10.6 without success.
I can recreate this bug on 1.4.9 and 1.4.10rc1 on a MacBook Pro running
Snow Leopard. I can also confirm that John's fix of passing
"--disable-asm" to the configure script works.
Can we get an #ifdef for Darwin to replace the ASM bl
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:55, jerome.bl...@nerim.net said:
> anyone that could explain me how gpg chooses which secret key to use or
> how I could tell gpg which one to use ?
Without an option, gpg uses the first available secret key for signing.
This is usually not desired, thus you can use "defau
Hello,
anyone that could explain me how gpg chooses which secret key to use or
how I could tell gpg which one to use ?
Or maybe a way I can tell gpg not to use the smart card while on a
certain computer.
I still don't get why it doesn't manage to use the proper secret key
and google is definit
16 matches
Mail list logo
