On 6/11/2010 12:39 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
Hi!
One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
respond to any of our queries to send us more informati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 11 June 2010 at 2:34:44 PM, in
, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> If there is such an RFC, it's rubbish;
I think there is no such RFC, just an assertion from a messaging
industry lobbying group that it's the "best" practice to block mail
from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 11 June 2010 at 8:00:09 PM, in
, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:18:05 -0500 John Clizbe
> articulated:
>> Mark H. Wood wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at
>> 05:57:50PM +0200, Joke de Buhr wrote: >> You do not
>> sacrifice legi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
> my e-mailer honored it automatically (perhaps it does). Because some
> lists to which I subscribe automatically reply to the lists, and some
> automatically reply to the original sender, and I cannot remember which
> is which. I know asking any par
On 11 June 2010 12:42, Werner Koch wrote:
> The culprit was supp...@resell.biz - I unsubscribed this address and
> banned it from further subscriptions.
Did alava...@gmail.com ever get removed? See
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2010-May/038724.html
Ben
__
On 06/11/10 04:55, Jerry wrote:
Which reminds me; there is a request at the end of every post I make.
Would it be to much of an imposition for you to honor that request?
In a word, yes. The Internet's "Robustness Principle" says, "Be liberal
in what you accept, and conservative in what you sen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Werner Koch escribió:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:15, w...@gnupg.org said:
>
>> the subject. This is a try to figure out who forwards postings to an
>> automated systems which in turn spams the original poster.
>
> The culprit was supp...@resell.biz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Werner Koch escribió:
> Hi!
>
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respond to any o
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:18:05 -0500
John Clizbe articulated:
> Mark H. Wood wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:57:50PM +0200, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> >> You do not sacrifice legitimate incoming mail because there is an
> >> RFC that clearly states mailservers do not operate from dynamic IP
> >>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Manpreet Singh Dhillon wrote:
> Greetings friends!
> I have this issue with which I want your help.
> Recently I installed Ubuntu Lucid Lynx 10.04 x64 on my laptop and as usual
> copied my .gnupg folder from my backup hard disk to my home directory.
> All my key confi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 11 June 2010 at 4:36:34 PM, in
, Jerry wrote:
> Evidently, the list manager employed here strips off
> any "Reply-To:" header and then fails to replace it
> with one that points to the list. Fortunately, not all
> mailing lists are c
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:14:29 -0400
Jean-David Beyer articulated:
> Jerry wrote (in part):
>
> >
> > Which reminds me; there is a request at the end of every post I
> > make. Would it be to much of an imposition for you to honor that
> > request?
> >
> > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/06/2010 11:15, Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a few hours ago I sent test mails to each subscribed user. The mails
> should look like regular mailing list mail but with your address also in
> the subject. This is a try to figure out who forwar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 10 June 2010 at 4:53:43 PM, in
, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:32:05 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
>> And i should probably add that it is indeed an infinitesimal drop in the
>> bucket compared to the other
Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:57:50PM +0200, Joke de Buhr wrote:
>> You do not sacrifice legitimate incoming mail because there is an RFC that
>> clearly states mailservers do not operate from dynamic IP addresses.
>> Therefore
>> they can not be considered valid.
>
> If ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 10 June 2010 at 4:39:46 PM, in
, Hauke Laging
wrote:
> But that is the wrong argument. The correct argument is
> about the key server share of spam in a world in which
> nearly everyone has a public key. Of course, in that
> world
working here
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 09:37 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respond to any of o
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:57:50PM +0200, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> You do not sacrifice legitimate incoming mail because there is an RFC that
> clearly states mailservers do not operate from dynamic IP addresses.
> Therefore
> they can not be considered valid.
If there is such an RFC, it's rubbish
__
Chris Ruff
email: jcr...@gmail.com
gpg key: 0x052A4FAD
gpg fgpr: 6530 8DA8 805C 707F 3611
9851 D057 FC41 052A 4FAD
On Jun 11, 2010, at 3:37, Werner Koch wrote:
Hi!
One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
automated ticketi
Jerry wrote (in part):
Which reminds me; there is a request at the end of every post I make.
Would it be to much of an imposition for you to honor that request?
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
I looked at the heade
Not sure who that was but I was not responsible
On Jun 11, 2010 4:26 AM, "Werner Koch" wrote:
Hi!
One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
re
Werner Koch wrote the following on 6/11/10 3:39 AM:
> Hi!
>
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respond to any of our queries to se
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:15:56 +0200
Werner Koch articulated:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:16, expires2...@ymail.com said:
>
> > delete them if they don't. Or one message to everybody with a
> > customised subject line for each. Alternatively, those of us who are
>
> That is a good idea. I was think
Email received correctly
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respon
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:33:23 -0400
Jameson Rollins articulated:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:27:12 -0400, Jerry
> wrote:
> > I am assuming that you wanted me to reply to this message. Its
> > intended purpose was not overly clear. At least not to me, but then
> > again I have not had my second cup
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:27:12 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> I am assuming that you wanted me to reply to this message. Its intended
> purpose was not overly clear. At least not to me, but then again I have
> not had my second cup of coffee this morning.
I think if he had wanted you to respond to it he wou
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:15, w...@gnupg.org said:
> the subject. This is a try to figure out who forwards postings to an
> automated systems which in turn spams the original poster.
The culprit was supp...@resell.biz - I unsubscribed this address and
banned it from further subscriptions.
Salam-S
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:37:34 +0200
Werner Koch articulated:
> Hi!
>
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respond to any of our qu
Greetings,
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respond to any of our
On Friday 11 June 2010 09:37:23 Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respond to any of our queries to sen
Any news about V2 ?
Thanks
AA
On 11 June 2010 10:33, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:58, jroll...@finestructure.net said:
>
>> regards to the Crypto Stick? Is that something that can be patched, or
>> is it a limitation of the communication protocol?
>
> Right that is a limitation of
Hi,
a few hours ago I sent test mails to each subscribed user. The mails
should look like regular mailing list mail but with your address also in
the subject. This is a try to figure out who forwards postings to an
automated systems which in turn spams the original poster.
Please ignore these m
On 11 Jun 2010 09:39 +0200, Werner Koch:
> Hi!
>
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respond to any of our queries to send us more
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:39, Werner Koch wrote:
> Sorry for the inconvenience,
No problem. It's not me :)
Richard
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Greetings friends!
I have this issue with which I want your help.
Recently I installed Ubuntu Lucid Lynx 10.04 x64 on my laptop and as usual
copied my .gnupg folder from my backup hard disk to my home directory.
All my key configuration was back. Then I created a new key for my another
email addres
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:58, jroll...@finestructure.net said:
> regards to the Crypto Stick? Is that something that can be patched, or
> is it a limitation of the communication protocol?
Right that is a limitation of an internal communication protocol. Not
hard to change but there are more import
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, at 09:37:42 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:37 where I
live) Werner Koch wrote:
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> r
Hi!
One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
respond to any of our queries to send us more information on the mails
triggering the posting. Thu
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:16, expires2...@ymail.com said:
> delete them if they don't. Or one message to everybody with a
> customised subject line for each. Alternatively, those of us who are
That is a good idea. I was thinking of bisecting the mailing list to
make sure that test mails receive the
39 matches
Mail list logo
