On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:40:28 -0400
Jean-David Beyer jeandav...@verizon.net articulated:
I see no way to do that. I have a Reply button and a Reply All
button and no others. There is no such button on that screen that
allows diddling buttons.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:58:19 -0500
Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas sonjamiche...@gmail.com articulated:
I would not trust Google with your data, far less mine. They have
all ready been accused of illegally pilfering through user data and
mining for
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:03:00 +0200
Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org articulated:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:40:28 -0400
Jean-David Beyer jeandav...@verizon.net articulated:
I see no way to do that. I have a Reply button and a Reply All
button and no
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:40:28 -0400
Jean-David Beyer jeandav...@verizon.net articulated:
I see no way to do that. I have a Reply button and a Reply All
button and no others. There is no such button on that screen that
allows diddling
On Sunday 13 June 2010, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
Conversely, many MUAs support the reply to list function that
should work correctly on this list.
Perhaps so, but my Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 dies not, and it is the
latest version
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Sunday 13 June 2010, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
Conversely, many MUAs support the reply to list function that
should work correctly on this list.
Perhaps so, but my Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 dies not, and it is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 10:03:00 AM, in
mid:201006131103.01...@thufir.ingo-kloecker.de, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
IMNSHO, it's not up to the mailing list admins to
dictate where replies to my posts should go. Therefore,
the mailing list
On 2010-06-11 09:38, Werner Koch wrote:
Hi!
One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
respond to any of our queries to send us more
Interestingly enough, the first email I read this morning had a link to
this:
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/06/12/2339209/Google-Tells-Congress-It-Disclosed-Wi-Fi-Sniffing
And that is just the tip of the ice burg.
--
Jerry
OMG!! Google is stealing and archiving pictures of my dopey
I read it but didn't see that I had to do anything. Did I read it
wrong seems a lot of people replied to theirs.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Sunday 13 June 2010, MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 10:03:00 AM, in
mid:201006131103.01...@thufir.ingo-kloecker.de, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
IMNSHO, it's not up to the mailing list admins to
dictate where replies to my posts should go. Therefore,
the mailing list software
Hi, i created a keyring a couple of years ago without any serious
intent. I kept my keys not so secure.
Now i want to restart, without changing ID, as i am always the same
person, but revoking all from the past.
What have I to do?
Thanks a lot
sec
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:12:54 +0200
Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org articulated:
Hmm, I never read anywhere that this would be the etiquette of this
group. It's certainly not mentioned on the listinfo page of
gnupg-users. Also, most people seem to reply to list only.
While it would appear that
Filippo Valsorda wrote the following on 6/13/10 12:34 PM:
Hi, i created a keyring a couple of years ago without any serious
intent. I kept my keys not so secure.
Now i want to restart, without changing ID, as i am always the same
person, but revoking all from the past.
What have I to do?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 6:01:34 PM, in
mid:aanlktik4p4gfazbrbntjvkuhdubkhtdvyaj_ckjjh...@mail.gmail.com,
Jeff Sadowski wrote:
I read it but didn't see that I had to do anything. Did
I read it wrong seems a lot of people replied to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 7:37:33 PM, in
mid:20100613143733.7baf8...@scorpio, Jerry wrote:
While it would appear that most users direct their
replies back to the list, there are a few morons who
feel it is their sworn duty to CC: the OP.
SPAM (in capital letters) is a canned precooked meat product made by
the Hormel Foods Corporation. (-;
Which is pretty good when sliced thin, pan fried and put on a toasted
English muffin with spicy mustard!
___
Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 6:12:54 PM, in
mid:201006131912.55...@thufir.ingo-kloecker.de, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Hmm, I never read anywhere that this would be the
etiquette of this group. It's certainly not mentioned
on the listinfo page of
Howdy,
Working on updating gnupg in FreeBSD and ran into a problem. GnuPG
2.0.15 requires libassuan 2.0.0, but to build the gpgsm module it
requires dirmngr, which requires libassuan 1.x. My understanding is that
there is a dirmngr update planned
19 matches
Mail list logo
