No Sir. The files compress well. They compress to the same size as the
packet reported by --list-packets. Ascii armor did what a previous poster
predicted, growing the file by about 1/3.
here is what should happen:
270Mbyte text file => compressed to 50 Mbyte => X 1.38 yielding 69Mbytes to
go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 17 June 2010 at 9:14:55 PM, in
, Hauke Laging
wrote:
>> A key may be sitting on a non-synchronising server
>> that has not been modified at all recently but
>> contains certifications not on my local copy. The key
>> has not change
On 6/17/2010 2:16 PM, Scott Lambdin wrote:
> The vender told our trading partner their PGP software bloats the file
> and that is just the way it is. I do not understand how the encrypted
> file (or the file that contains the encrypted file) can be over twice
> the size of the original, when the s
I am out of the office until 06/24/2010.
I am out of the office until Thursday June 24th. If this is a production
problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336 or email Bob Olson
at robert.ol...@williams.com. I will have limited mail and cell phone
access.
Note: This is an automate
The vender told our trading partner their PGP software bloats the file and
that is just the way it is. I do not understand how the encrypted file (or
the file that contains the encrypted file) can be over twice the size of the
original, when the senders believe they have used compression.
I also
Am Donnerstag 17 Juni 2010 21:23:40 schrieb MFPA:
> > A different approach might save even more bandwidth:
> > Most keys do now change often. It is useless to
> > download a key that has not changed.
>
> A key may be sitting on a non-synchronising server that has not been
> modified at all recent
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:51:38 +0200, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> On Thursday 17 June 2010 19:00:21 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On 06/17/2010 12:45 PM, Joke de Buhr wrote:
>> > Unlike PGP GnuPG is a non-commercial tool. There is no warranty. You
>> > can't sue anyone if GnuPG does not do what it's suppo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 at 8:26:11 PM, in
, Hauke Laging
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010 19:10:17 schrieb Daniel Kahn
> Gillmor:
>> Do you have other suggestions? We should consider
>> bringing a prioritized form of these to the sks-deve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 17 June 2010 at 2:23:37 PM, in
, Asger Larsen wrote:
> Hello! Some keys I cannot import, others OK. See
> attachments
I see no attachments. As far as I remember, this list removes
attachments.
> Both sending computer and receiv
On Thursday 17 June 2010 19:00:21 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 06/17/2010 12:45 PM, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> > Unlike PGP GnuPG is a non-commercial tool. There is no warranty. You
> > can't sue anyone if GnuPG does not do what it's supposed to do.
>
> If your goal is to be able to sue someone over
Gorugantu, Prakash wrote:
> Our project has a requirement where we need to pull a file using PGP
> encryption/decryption from one of our clients ftp servers. Please let us
> know if we can use GNUPG to encrypt/decrypt files with PGP. We read
> somewhere in your licensing agreement that GNUPG for P
On 06/17/2010 12:45 PM, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> Unlike PGP GnuPG is a non-commercial tool. There is no warranty. You can't
> sue
> anyone if GnuPG does not do what it's supposed to do.
If your goal is to be able to sue someone over proprietary software, i
strongly advise you to read the relevant E
On Thursday 17 June 2010 18:21:32 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Prakash--
>
> On 06/17/2010 09:59 AM, Gorugantu, Prakash wrote:
> > Our project has a requirement where we need to pull a file using PGP
> > encryption/decryption from one of our clients ftp servers. Please let us
> > know if we can
Hi Prakash--
On 06/17/2010 09:59 AM, Gorugantu, Prakash wrote:
> Our project has a requirement where we need to pull a file using PGP
> encryption/decryption from one of our clients ftp servers. Please let us
> know if we can use GNUPG to encrypt/decrypt files with PGP. We read
> somewhere in you
Hi,
Our project has a requirement where we need to pull a file using PGP
encryption/decryption from one of our clients ftp servers. Please let us
know if we can use GNUPG to encrypt/decrypt files with PGP. We read
somewhere in your licensing agreement that GNUPG for PGP is only for
non-commerc
Hello!
Some keys I cannot import, others OK.
See attachments
Both sending computer and receiving computer use:
gpgme: 0.3.14
Thunderbird mail client 3.0.4 (enigmail 1.0.1 Add-on)
Mac OS X Snowleopard 10.6.4
Typically Public keys which are exported as file are OK.
If you just rightclick the key and
On 06/14/2010 12:30 PM, Honia A wrote:
>
> Hi, (i think i previously sent this question to the wrong mailinglist)
no, you went it on the right one first -- this is a gcrypt question, not
a gnupg question.
i've answered you on gcrypt-devel. Sorry that no one else has answered
in the meantime.s
Hi,
I'm trying to import secret keys from a file and at the same time I
would like to verify if the user has the passphrases for the secret
keys.
Is there a way to check the key ID before importing the secret key?
Then I could first ask for the secret keys ID in the exported file,
next send to the
>The next 2 is more important; the one below /usr/local should have a
> #if FD_SETSIZE > 8192
YES - All pth.h have these lines :
#define PTH_VERSION_STR "2.0.7 (08-Jun-2006)"
/* check if the user requests a bigger FD_SETSIZE than we can handle */
#if defined(FD_SETSIZE)
#if FD_SETSIZE
Can anyone please help me with this? Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/undefined-symbol%3A-gcry_md_hash_buffer%E2%80%8F-tp28889767p28905755.html
Sent from the GnuPG - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
