Re: auto refresh-keys

2010-06-18 Thread Hauke Laging
Hello, Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010 02:10:22 schrieb MFPA: I don't know how common or uncommon it might be. I just know that, of the keys in my keyring of about 400 keys, I have noticed more deviations away from my default keyserver to key.asc files than to alternate keyservers. but this is

Multiple signatures

2010-06-18 Thread Boris
Hi, I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by signing a signed file...). Thanks, Koushkov ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org

Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)

2010-06-18 Thread Jerry
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:04:41 -0600 Richard Hamilton hamil...@us.ibm.com articulated: I am out of the office until 06/24/2010. I am out of the office until Thursday June 24th. If this is a production problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336 or email Bob Olson at

Help adding IDEA within GnuPG 2.0.9

2010-06-18 Thread Palle Sejer Larsen
Hi group, I am trying to include support for IDEA within GnuPG 2.0.9 running under Linux. I have downloaded the idea.c module via the link on this page: http://www.gnupg.org/faq/why-not-idea.html, have compiled it and have added the load-extension path-to-idea/idea statement to my conf

Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)

2010-06-18 Thread Jean-David Beyer
Jerry wrote: On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:04:41 -0600 I was just stating to a colleague that it had been months since an errant vacation message had been posted on this forum. Well, thanks to Bob, that drought has been quenched. With the summer season now upon us and vacations becoming the norm, I

Re: Multiple signatures

2010-06-18 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 6/17/10 11:33 PM, Boris wrote: Hi, I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by signing a signed file...). gpg --armor -u signer -u signer2 -u signer3 --clearsign filename

Re: Multiple signatures

2010-06-18 Thread David Shaw
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote: Hi, I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by signing a signed file...). Sure. gpg -u signer_1 -u signer_2 -u signer_3

Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)

2010-06-18 Thread Jean-David Beyer
David Smith wrote: Jean-David Beyer wrote: If I understand correctly, this is done by setting the precedence of the vacation e-mail to bulk instead of something else (list?), and that mailing list programs do not send the stuff marked bulk. Is that not how mailing list programs work?

Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)

2010-06-18 Thread David Smith
Jean-David Beyer wrote: David Smith wrote: Mailing lists programs normally send mails with the Precedence: bulk or Precedence: junk header, and then the autoresponder should recognise this and choose not to respond to mails with the bulk or junk precedence header. It is up to the

Re: Multiple signatures

2010-06-18 Thread David Shaw
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote: Hi, I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by signing a signed file...). Sure. gpg -u signer_1 -u signer_2 -u signer_3

Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)

2010-06-18 Thread David Smith
Jean-David Beyer wrote: Well, the stuff I get from the Gnupg-users@gnupg.org list has precedence: list set. Other lists to which I subscribe use Precedence normal or precedence: bulk. Regular e-mail does not have precedence set at all. It seems to me that mailing lists should get their acts

Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)

2010-06-18 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 18/06/2010 14:24, David Smith wrote: Jean-David Beyer wrote: David Smith wrote: Mailing lists programs normally send mails with the Precedence: bulk or Precedence: junk header, and then the autoresponder should recognise this and choose not

Uninstall

2010-06-18 Thread His Steveness
Hi there, for a Test i installed GPG on MacOsX 5.8, so far so good, works fine, thank you Guys btw. for that nice Work. But now i hang there and im not able to uninstall the hole thing. Can someone tell me a workthrough, cause im not so close to Procedures that be probable neccessary to it.

Re: auto refresh-keys

2010-06-18 Thread David Shaw
On Jun 14, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 06/04/2010 01:35 PM, Micah Anderson wrote: It seems like the best solution would be to build into gnupg the functionality that is similar to the automatic trust database operation: have gpg auto-refresh from the configured

Scute: sec_error_pkcs11_function_failed (was Re: Crypto Stick released!)

2010-06-18 Thread Alex Mauer
On 05/03/2010 10:17 AM, Joke de Buhr wrote: I'm using Ubuntu lucid (amd64) with firefox 3.6.3. On Monday 03 May 2010 15:49:35 Werner Koch wrote: On Mon, 3 May 2010 12:22, j...@seiken.de said: selecting my key I always get this firefox error message sec_error_pkcs11_function_failed. Okay

Re: auto refresh-keys

2010-06-18 Thread David Shaw
On Jun 14, 2010, at 7:58 PM, MFPA wrote: On Monday 14 June 2010 at 5:50:32 PM, in mid:4c165dd8.5020...@fifthhorseman.net, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Network or keyserver failures during an auto-refresh should be accepted and the rest of the operation should continue (though the

Re: Multiple signatures

2010-06-18 Thread vedaal
Robert J. Hansen rjh at sixdemonbag.org wrote on Fri Jun 18 14:13:56 CEST 2010 : I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by signing a signed file...). gpg --armor -u signer -u

Re: auto refresh-keys

2010-06-18 Thread Doug Barton
On 06/18/10 12:42, David Shaw wrote: The danger here is that it might take a long time (minutes+) to realize that the keyserver and/or network wasn't going to cooperate. This could seriously slow down many GPG operations. I've been following this discussion with interest as I've seen