On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:26:19PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:20, war_is_pe...@privatdemail.net said:
>
> > While you're at it, you might want to update zlib to version 1.2.5 -
> > looking at the source, it seems that the currently used version is 1.1.4.
>
> I see no reaso
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:26:19PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:20, war_is_pe...@privatdemail.net said:
>
> > While you're at it, you might want to update zlib to version 1.2.5 -
> > looking at the source, it seems that the currently used version is 1.1.4.
>
> I see no reaso
> I see no reason for such an update.
I remembered something with fixed security vulnerabilities - but those
possible security vulnerabilities seem to be introduced in later
versions than 1.1.4, which leaves bug fixes and performance improvements.
___
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:20, war_is_pe...@privatdemail.net said:
> While you're at it, you might want to update zlib to version 1.2.5 -
> looking at the source, it seems that the currently used version is 1.1.4.
I see no reason for such an update.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind f
> However to build the 1.4 windows installer we better use the
> new source along with an updated bzip.
While you're at it, you might want to update zlib to version 1.2.5 -
looking at the source, it seems that the currently used version is 1.1.4.
___
Gn
Hi,
The Windows installer version of GnuPG 1.4 uses a statically linked bzip
library. Thus the bzip2 bug affects this version.
We have not done a gnupg 1.4 release for more than a year. I believe it
is best to first do a release candidate. There a couple of bug fixes
collected over the last ye
