iOn Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:50:29 -0400 Werner Koch
wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:50, ved...@nym.hush.com said:
>
>> (btw, Disastry is the one who wrote the IDEA.dll module,
>> specifically to bridge the gap between gnupg and pgp users.)
>
>Hmmm, the signature claims that I wrote it.
I stand corr
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:50, ved...@nym.hush.com said:
> (btw, Disastry is the one who wrote the IDEA.dll module,
> specifically to bridge the gap between gnupg and pgp users.)
Hmmm, the signature claims that I wrote it. However, I still recommend
not to use it.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Di
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:17, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> Inline signatures /are/ standards. RFC 4880 is far newer than RFC 3156:
> by your logic, 4880 should supersede 3156 and we should all move to the
> current standard and abandon 3156 support.
You are mixing the MIME standards with the OpenPG
MFPA:
>> Trust is not transitive. If A trusts B and B trusts C,
>> there is no requirement that A trusts C.
>
> In real life, true. But what about the GnuPG default of trusting a key
> that carries certifications from 1 fully trusted or 3 marginally
> trusted keys. Unless you manually inspect each
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:17:59 -0400
Robert J. Hansen articulated:
> On 3/14/2011 8:23 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > The point being that at some point you have to move on.
>
> Yes, exactly. At some point *you* have to move on -- but you don't
> get to say if, or when, other people decide to move on.
>
>
Gloria.Teo at bit.admin.ch Gloria.Teo at bit.admin.ch wrote on
Mon Mar 14 11:23:26 CET 2011 :
>gpg: epflpepfl": preference for cipher algorithm 1
Cipher Algorithm 1 is IDEA, and was used as a default cipher for
RSA keys by 6.5.8
GnuPG does not use IDEA although it will accept the IDEA module.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:23, gnupg.u...@seibercom.net said:
> Perhaps a possible solution would be to freeze "GNUPG" at its present
> state of development. Now, start the creation of a new branch that
Fortunately this is not required. GnuPG does not know about mail; it
does not even know about PGP
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:57, thaj...@gmail.com said:
> I use a screen reader called JAWS For Windows. The GUI is not screen
> reader accessible, meaning I can not use the Arrow keys, Tab, Shift+Tab
I see that you are talking about GPA for Windows. It is quite possible
that this is not up to what th
On 3/14/2011 8:23 AM, Jerry wrote:
> The point being that at some point you have to move on.
Yes, exactly. At some point *you* have to move on -- but you don't get
to say if, or when, other people decide to move on.
For the time being, a lot of people are still on platforms that use
outdated sof
On 03/14/2011 06:23 AM, Mike Acker wrote:
> I don't like GPA and I don't like Cleopatra either. In the first place
> you should need only 1 key-manager. Evidently GPA didn't cut it and so
> they tried Cleopatra and missed with that too
Who's "they"? The developers behind GPA are not the same dev
I had used the above -- obsolete/MIT distribution of PGP for some time.
It is unfortunately, obsolete: it had a much better GUI than GnuPG,
especially when you wanted to examine a key.
I think though that PGP has an assortment of different levels of
support; the above being only valid through Lev
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:28:02 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
[snip]
This entire thread breaks down to a few simple principals of which the
most prominent one is if you are going to become a slave to the past.
While one's method may be more circuitous than another's is irrelevant.
The final goal i
On 03/13/2011 09:21 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> I apologise in advance if this is a stupid question to ask now or if
> people already asked it before I stepped on the scene, but which
> algorithm is more secure: DSA and EL GAMAL or RSA? I know the latter has
> undergone a ridiculous amount of scrutin
I think I made the mistake of using HTML format the first time then
learnt my signature failed to validate. I realised it was because of the
HTML check box being checked; thus, I have disabled that. I have also
disabled the text signature for replies.
On 14/03/2011 02:24 AM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
Hi,
1. I've tried to install PGP 6.5.8 on SUSE SLES 11 and it doesn't
work. I gave up and
2. Try to import the pgp (6.5.8) keys (public and private) on my
server (SUSE SLES 11) with GPG 2.0.9.
While importing the private key, I get
gpg: key B5AC473D: secret key imported
gpg:
I use a screen reader called JAWS For Windows. The GUI is not screen
reader accessible, meaning I can not use the Arrow keys, Tab, Shift+Tab
and any other navigational keys to use the GPA utility like you can with
the mouse. I really hate that; people have no idea how much it annoys
me. I might wri
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 01:40, k...@grant-olson.net said:
> - GPG4WIN is the right package to install gpg2 on windows, so you've got
> the right installer. It's a shame GPA doesn't work with a screen reader.
What is the problem with GPA? It is a plain gtk+ application and thus
should have the same
17 matches
Mail list logo
