On Friday 22 July 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
Chris Poole
CAF=p9qbcmfqkvv_49a5nysoswzkh2ka_kjo5wjy2onm6yhs...@mail.gmail.com
wrote on 7/22/11 10:38:39 AM:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Charly Avital shavi...@mac.com
wrote:
When your passphrase has been cached for each of those
As far as I know every subkey holds its own passphrase (per default,
they are all identical for a given primary key). This means that
passphrase requests are actually not action-based, but key-based.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. :)
Richard
___
Hello everyone,
one of my keys (the one I'm signing this message with) was created a
while back and uses a 1024 bit DSA primary key. For encryption I'm using
a 4096 bit RSA subkey, and for singing a 2048 bit DSA subkey (due to the
smaller signature).
gpg2 --list-packets for my primary key and
On 7/23/11 10:19 AM, Edmond wrote:
But since AFAIK both 1024 bit DSA and SHA1 hashes are not recommended
for use anymore (at least in new systems), I was wondering if I should
issue a new primary key.
This is impossible to answer, since we don't know exactly what threats
you're facing.
2011/7/23 Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org:
There is already the option --ignore-cache-for-signing (curiously the
corresponding option for decryption is missing, i.e. it's not possible to use
the cache for signing but not for decryption), so why not add another option
like
Hello Robert.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
So far, OTR adoption seems unjustifiable, really. I mean, it uses the
Diffie-Hellman key exchange method with block ciphers.
Why is this a problem?
You know, secrets are shared. 100% increase (at
On 7/23/11 1:04 PM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote:
You know, secrets are shared. 100% increase (at least) in exposing
risks.
I need to see a citation for this. What you're claiming is at odds with
everything I've ever learned about how DHKEA operates.
___
Hi Aron,
you are somewhat arrogant.
Please read what I wrote till completion.
Regards,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:56:42PM -0300, Marcio B. Jr. wrote:
Hello Daniel,
sorry for such a delay; this has been a wild
On 07/23/2011 07:04 PM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
So far, OTR adoption seems unjustifiable, really. I mean, it uses the
Diffie-Hellman key exchange method with block ciphers.
Why is this a problem?
You know, secrets
Hi Robert.
Secrecy sharing constitutes sort of a symmetric fact when more than
one instance is involved and you ask me for a citation?
I resumed this thread in order to clarify whether Kopete's OpenPGP
plugin was really superior, compared to the OTR one, and all people
say is OTR and its
On 7/23/11 2:36 PM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote:
Secrecy sharing constitutes sort of a symmetric fact when more than
one instance is involved and you ask me for a citation?
Yes. I am quite certain that if, say, Daniel Gillmor were to assert
the Earth is round and I were to ask him for a citation, he
11 matches
Mail list logo
