On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:59, harni...@gmail.com said:
it? If so, then I'd suggest that a quiet execution be performed that
way only the exit code can be used that it's failure.
You should not rely on the exit code but parse all the information
returned by GPG. GPGME makes this easy.
Given that
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:15, ciprian.crac...@gmail.com said:
* implement your own fake `gpg-agent` which I have no ideea what
actually implies;
Don't do this.
* implement your own fake `pinentry` which would be much simpler
as it only has to implement the assuan protocol; but you'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 31/07/12 1:14 AM, David Shaw wrote:
Yes, this is expected behavior. It follows from what I explained
earlier in this thread. When you use --override-session-key, you
bypass the quick check (after all, you gave the override key -
what is
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:11, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
3) The program can be run from removable media, i.e., it
requires no installation and assumes no network access for
either key exchange or in operation. There are binaries
for all three major platforms (Win32, Linux and Mac OSX).
I have heard,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Kevin, list,
I just upgraded from Mac OS X 10.7 to 10.8, and my ZeitControl cards, which
were formerly working perfectly, are now inaccessible.
please note that 10.8 brings significant changes (namely sandboxing) to Mac OS X
which does
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:56, b...@adversary.org said:
On a related note, is it possible to extract the session key
(--show-session-key), but without decrypting the file in the process?
Just obtain the session key and stop there? I've already tried -n
There is no such option. I once did
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:00:23PM +0200 Also sprach Olav Seyfarth:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Kevin, list,
I just upgraded from Mac OS X 10.7 to 10.8, and my ZeitControl cards, which
were formerly working perfectly, are now inaccessible.
please note that
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:54, ciprian.crac...@gmail.com said:
Not a good idea, because GnuPG 2.1 requires the gpg-agent and won't see
any private key stuff.
Not necessarily if you use the `--batch`, `--no-use-agent`, or
`--no-tty` (or a mix of the I'm not sure right now, but the manual
On 2012.07.31. 12:35, Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:11, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
Why do you think gpg2 won't work or does any network access without user
consent?
gpg2 requires gpg agent..., i was referring to posibility
to making it a portable application (not requiring
installation,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:54, ciprian.crac...@gmail.com said:
Not a good idea, because GnuPG 2.1 requires the gpg-agent and won't see
any private key stuff.
Not necessarily if you use the `--batch`, `--no-use-agent`, or
If this is the wrong place to ask, please point me in the right
direction. Where can I learn more about importing, if such a thing is
even done this way, and making use of message signatures which utilize
an smime.p7s file? I got a message from someone who uses this, and I
need to learn about
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:53, ciprian.crac...@gmail.com said:
First of all I would really have liked the tool to not just ignore
the `--no-user-agent` flag and bail out...
That would make migration for user of 2.0 to 2.1 too complicate. We try
to do the migration as smooth as possible.
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:57, auto15963...@hushmail.com said:
even done this way, and making use of message signatures which utilize
an smime.p7s file? I got a message from someone who uses this, and I
Feel free to ask here. GnuPG has a complete CMS/X.509 (aka S/MIME)
implementation.
like
On 31/07/12 09:35, Werner Koch - w...@gnupg.org wrote:
Why do you think gpg2 won't work or does any network access
without user consent?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it is unreasonable to expect anybody
to successfully and safely use gpg without understanding the
concepts and mastering the
auto15963931 jv92pc$ct5$1...@dough.gmane.org July 31, 2012 2:47:22 PM wrote:
If this is the wrong place to ask, please point me in the right
direction. Where can I learn more about importing, if such a thing is
even done this way, and making use of message signatures which utilize
an smime.p7s
On 7/31/2012 8:17 AM, peter.segm...@wronghead.com wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it is unreasonable to expect anybody
to successfully and safely use gpg without understanding the
concepts and mastering the skills essential to the WOT:
This is not at all the case.
Set up a trusted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/31/2012 11:04 PM, Sam Whited wrote:
where to pull from (presumably there is an rsync server
somewhere?).
Right after spamming the list I realized that the ftp server probably
also handled rsync. Other recommendations are still welcome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/28/2012 03:20 PM, HardKor wrote:
I just set up a mirror of the GnuPG website.
I was considering running a GnuPG mirror for a while, but couldn't
find any information about where (geographically) they needed mirrors,
how often they
18 matches
Mail list logo
