Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 27/03/13 14:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > I created it, as far as I recall, from my copy direct from Ulrich,
> > which had no Mail-Followup-To
>
> Correct, the problem originated when you replied[1] to Werner's mail[2].
> Werner's mail had the following header:
>
> Ma
On 3/29/2013 3:21 PM, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> A scandal is unlikely unless the people have wildly unrealistic
> expectations in the performance of the victim. The only way I could
> see you having a scandal on your hands if your identity was revealed
> would be if you made claims that it couldn't be
On 28-03-2013 12:13, Kristine Concha wrote:
> Dear Support,
This mailinglist is not an official supportline.
> GnuPG is crashing on my Windows 8 machine:
I recommend upgrade to windows 7 or XP. You are getting an error in some
GUI components, not in GnuPG itself. You can't expect all GUI develo
On 03/29/2013 11:17 AM, adrelanos wrote:
>> Using your real identity would be the alternative. The trade-off is
>> easier key signatures vs. identity obscurity.
>
>> It would only be safer in
>> the sense that there won't be a scandal when/if your identity is
>> uncovered.
>
> Why would that be a
Peter Lebbing:
> On 27/03/13 22:15, Leo Gaspard wrote:
>> until a lot of people verify and sign your public key.
>
> People might be more inclined to sign the key when it says something like
>
> adrelanos (Whonix signing key)
Yes, that a good suggestion worth to try and simple to do for my next
Markus Reichelt:
> * adrelanos wrote:
>
>> How can I establish a pseudonym that no one can easily fake while
>> remaining anonymous?
>
> a) you can't
> define 'easily' - these days nobody reads/checks anything anymore
> (there's some XKCD about this issue)
Well, I recognize that ratio of image
Johnicholas Hines:
> The question is how to distinguish yourself from a nation-state's covert
> agency purporting to be an individual interested in anonymity; you need to
> do something that the agency would find difficult to do.
I don't think that's possible at all.
> Getting your name and key i
Forlasanto:
> On 3/29/2013 9:38 AM, adrelanos wrote:
>>> Forgive me for saying so, but for something as high-profile as a linux
>>> distro, using a pseudonym for signing the distro for the sake of
>>> anonymity doesn't sound like a great plan.
>> What's the alternative? Using my real identity? Does
I've changed the subject line to indicate that this thread is about
establishing a pseudonym, *not* about anonymous users. This is a subtle
but important difference.
On 03/29/2013 12:41 PM, Forlasanto wrote:
> The web of trust is simply a conventional way for people to judge how
> trustworthy yo
On 3/29/2013 9:38 AM, adrelanos wrote:
>> Forgive me for saying so, but for something as high-profile as a linux
>> distro, using a pseudonym for signing the distro for the sake of
>> anonymity doesn't sound like a great plan.
> What's the alternative? Using my real identity? Does it make it any sa
Forlasanto:
> Pseudonyms are fine by me. I don't have a problem signing a pseudonym
> key. The pseudonym just has to have context that I can verify. For
> instance, if the claim is "Whonix signing key," then that tells me the
> way to verify the key is by checking the signature of various releases
11 matches
Mail list logo
