On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Don Saklad dsak...@gnu.org wrote:
A PC user unfamiliar with any free software would like to send messages
that only the two of us can read. Now what do I do? The numbers of steps
for it appear to be insurmountable! And I've failed to understand GNUPG
myself.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-04-05 05:23, Don Saklad wrote:
A PC user unfamiliar with any free software would like to send
messages that only the two of us can read. Now what do I do? The
numbers of steps for it appear to be insurmountable! And I've failed
to understand
A PC user unfamiliar with any free software would like to send messages that
only the two of us can read. Now what do I do? The numbers of steps for it
appear to be insurmountable! And I've failed to understand GNUPG myself.
___
Gnupg-users mailing
Please fix subscribe at
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/gpg4win-announce
Subscribe didn't work !... interrupted by the warning untrusted.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
I've changed the subject line to indicate that this thread is about
establishing a pseudonym, *not* about anonymous users. This is a subtle
but important difference.
People assume pseudonyms for various reasons, anonymity being but one
of
On 04/05/2013 11:39 AM, Stan Tobias wrote:
People assume pseudonyms for various reasons, anonymity being but one
of them. It is clear the person behind adrelanos wants to remain
anonymous, while giving a name to his action.
This is practically the definition of a pseudonym, not anonymity.
On 04/05/2013 11:39 AM, Stan Tobias wrote:
The problem we're trying to solve here is how to ascertain originality
of a software development line, IOW how to authenticate it.
What I do is get my OS (a Linux distribution from Red Hat) on a DVD
directly from them. It contains, along with
On 05/04/13 20:16, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Probably the software Red Hat supplies is kept on a machine that is not
on the Internet and it is all signed on that machine. At which point,
the signed software is placed on an Internet-connected machine for
downloading (seems like a good idea to
On 04/05/2013 04:27 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
I have no idea how Red Hat does this, but it seems unlikely to me. It's
not connected to the internet, but signs the whole repository, and each
individual security update etcetera. Is there a guy who keeps going back
and forth with a USB stick
