Re: Aw: Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:51, jo...@netpage.dk said: I have the same problem on my german 64bit Windows 8 with Version 2.2.0-beta31 Are you shure that you are using the new version; i.e. did you reboot your machine? Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein

Re: Several master keys vs. master key and subkeys

2013-07-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:16, martin.brochh...@gmail.com said: This person claims that subkeys are not the best option because: ### QUOTE ### Disadvantages of subkeys: * I find them Confusing. They mandotory part of the standard and solve the problem of having separate keys for separate

Re: How to back up my key

2013-07-16 Thread Einar Ryeng
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 07:03:54AM +0800, Martin wrote: Now I have to walk down yet another rabbit hole and read up about secure cards :) You don't really have to, though I prefer the added security and, at least after you've set it up to work properly, the added conveninece of the Crypto

Re: Aw: Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:28, jo...@netpage.dk said: Yes I am sure. I even uninstalled it completely right now, rebooted and then reinstalled! Thanks. Well, there is a problem we need to figure out. Using my Windows versions (no Windows8 here right now), I can't replicate the problem. Thus I

Re: GpgEX for 64 bit Windows test version

2013-07-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:09, w...@gnupg.org said: remove the debug output and use this updated fix. Something might have gone wrong during the build process - we need to check. We figured out what has gone wrong: The problem affects only the 64 bit version of gpgex. The gpg4win installer uses

Re: Several master keys vs. master key ,and subkeys

2013-07-16 Thread Sin Trenton
On 2013-07-16 10:52, gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org wrote: Message: 2 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:09:38 +0200 From: Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org To: Martin martin.brochh...@gmail.com Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: Re: Several master keys vs. master key and subkeys Message-ID:

Re: Several master keys vs. master key and subkeys

2013-07-16 Thread Philipp Schafft
reflum, On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 07:16 +0800, Martin wrote: * I find them Confusing. So what's the point here? If he doesn't yet the concept it doesn't mean it is bad. It's just a statement about him, not the standard. e.g. I haven't got the concept of armoured concrete, yet I life in a house

Re: Several master keys vs. master key ,and subkeys

2013-07-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:21, biggles.tren...@gmail.com said: A GnuPG key has a private key and a public key. When you first create All public key algorithms work with the concept of a keypair. GnuPG does the same. This is the low level maths. To make it usable we need to bind mail addresses to

encrypting multiple files into a single output file

2013-07-16 Thread Ira.Kirschner
We are converting from using PGP to using GnuPG and we are trying to make it seamless to our customers. Using PGP, when we had multiple files to deliver, we could have each file encrypted and placed into a PGP archive. The client could then decipher the archive to extract al the encrypted

RE: encrypting multiple files into a single output file

2013-07-16 Thread Ira.Kirschner
With PGP you can do something like: pgp -e -r pgpkey filelist -o output file name --archive This will create a single output file name with the entire filelist each individually encrypted. -Original Message- From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor [mailto:d...@fifthhorseman.net] Sent:

Re: encrypting multiple files into a single output file

2013-07-16 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Ira-- On 07/16/2013 11:08 AM, ira.kirsch...@sungard.com wrote: With PGP you can do something like: pgp -e -r pgpkey filelist -o output file name --archive This will create a single output file name with the entire filelist each individually encrypted. I don't have PGP, so i still

Re: encrypting multiple files into a single output file

2013-07-16 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 07/16/2013 10:49 AM, ira.kirsch...@sungard.com wrote: We are converting from using PGP to using GnuPG and we are trying to make it seamless to our customers. Using PGP, when we had multiple files to deliver, we could have each file encrypted and placed into a PGP archive. The client

Re: Several master keys vs. master key ,and subkeys

2013-07-16 Thread Sin Trenton
On 2013-07-16 15:32, Werner Koch wrote: You have a version B of your key, with a different password than version A (where the primary key is still present)? Not that one particular subkey per se has a different password? Usually this does not happen because GnuPG 2.1 has no feature to merge

Re: encrypting multiple files into a single output file

2013-07-16 Thread Henry Hertz Hobbit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/16/2013 03:24 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Hi Ira-- On 07/16/2013 11:08 AM, ira.kirsch...@sungard.com wrote: With PGP you can do something like: pgp -e -r pgpkey filelist -o output file name --archive This will create a single

Re: encrypting multiple files into a single output file

2013-07-16 Thread Henry Hertz Hobbit
On 07/16/2013 04:04 PM, Werner Koch wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:08, ira.kirsch...@sungard.com said: This will create a single output file name with the entire filelist each individually encrypted. That is the PGP Zip format, right? We support it for ages; our tool is called gpg-zip