-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 6 November 2013 at 11:42:49 AM, in
, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Well take for example iOs: using pgp is a sort of a
> nightmare.
So I have heard.
> The reasons why I think smime is easier to use for the
> average user are: smime is
(Sorry, failed again to reply to the list, so you probably have this message
twice again.)
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:32:38PM -0800, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> >On Tuesday 5 November 2013 at 11:03:19 PM, in
> >, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> >
> >> But if you sign it with an exportable
> >> signature, you ar
can BitMail.sf.net as a p2p email tool for encrypted Email (and
hybrid with IMAP-Email) be regarded as a reference model for
research to create a secure Email Client? as it uses both, gnupg and
openssl!
I would suggest figuring out very precisely what you intend by
"secure." Once you hav
>> "MFPA" == MFPA writes:
Hi
> Hi
> On Monday 4 November 2013 at 10:43:43 PM, in
> , Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> - from my own experience I am convinced that smime
>> is much easierthan gpg[2] for reasons I am not
>> going to repeat here. (I got 7out of 10 of my
>> fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/11/13 22:01, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> I send five variants (but the best is all of them :) ):
Thanks Marko! Is it OK if I rephrase two of them like this?:
"I use GnuPG because I was taught it's a sin to open other people's letters"
"I use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/11/13 15:52, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> Now, for some new quotes
Thanks Ben, I couldn't have asked for more :)
Don't worry about official endorsement from the Pirate Party AU - your quote
communicate GPG's importance sufficiently.
Best,
Sam.
-
