Thank you both for your detailed answers - they were really helpful for me!
Johannes
On Friday 08 November 2013 19:01:34 Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 08/11/13 18:07, Tapio Sokura wrote:
Nope, OpenPGP uses EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5, which is completely deterministic.
I /think/ GnuPG doesn't need any
Hi!
Is it possible to have subkeys with different comments than the main
key? How?
Cheers,
adrelanos
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Am Di 12.11.2013, 15:50:10 schrieb adrelanos:
Is it possible to have subkeys with different comments than the main
key? How?
The main question is: What do you mean by comments? You probably refer to
the comment part of a user ID. But it has not been determined what exactly
that refers to.
A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:17:16 +0100
Sam Tuke samt...@gnupg.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/11/13 22:01, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
I send five variants (but the best is all of them :) ):
Thanks Marko! Is it OK
Hauke Laging:
Am Di 12.11.2013, 15:50:10 schrieb adrelanos:
Is it possible to have subkeys with different comments than the main
key? How?
The main question is: What do you mean by comments? You probably refer to
the comment part of a user ID.
I am referring this... When you run gpg
Am Mi 13.11.2013, 00:34:38 schrieb adrelanos:
But it has not been determined what exactly
that refers to.
I don't understand what you mean by that sentence.
I mean: It is difficult to say A UID comment refers to the mainkey or A UID
comment refers to the subkey (and make sense). A user
