On 07/01/2014, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 07/01/14 17:27, Werner Koch wrote:
>> See the card HOWTO or try gpg --card-edit, admin, help.
>
> Additionally, in the OpenPGP Card 2.0.1 spec, the DO with tag C4 on page
> 17,
> section 7.2.2 (VERIFY) and section 7.2.8 (PSO: COMPUTE DIGITAL SIGNATURE)
> al
Hi all,
I'm seeing several segfaults from dirmngr, tried googling around but with
no success this time :)
[sab gen 11 13:22:51 2014] dirmngr[11220]: segfault at 580 ip
7fdbfe5abbe1 sp 7fff12335980 error 4 in
libpth.so.20.0.27[7fdbfe5a2000+13000]
backtrace:
cova@calvin ~ $ gdb /usr/bin/di
On Jan 9, 2014 7:16 PM, "David Tomaschik" wrote:
>
> if the machine you are using for crypto operations is compromised, you have
> lost (at least for the operations conducted while it is compromised)
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I don't entirely accept this. Surely if you are
signing with a key stored
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2014 7:16 PM, "David Tomaschik"
> wrote:
> >
> > if the machine you are using for crypto operations is compromised, you
> have lost (at least for the operations conducted while it is compromised)
>
> Perhaps I'm wrong, but I don't ent
On 11/01/2014, David Tomaschik wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> On Jan 9, 2014 7:16 PM, "David Tomaschik"
>> wrote:
>> > if the machine you are using for crypto operations is compromised, you
>> have lost (at least for the operations conducted while it is compromised
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 11 January 2014 at 11:18:55 PM, in
,
Sam Kuper wrote:
> Yes, as I said, it could tamper with the message. But
> if it does that, then when a recipient attempts to
> verify the signature, gpg --verify will give the
> message, "gpg:
