I apologize for having triggered the emotionally agitated exchange in
this thread culminating in someone bringing up the German-Jew trauma.
I did not intend this and will try to make future points in a more
moderate language. I acknowledge the outburst of true emotion by the
person I responded to
The YYY (-a famous three letter agency) e.g. denies to archive content
of YYY citizens mails. It is thus perfectly reasonable to assume it does
so with all other ones.
This is not a reasonable inference.
I deny being able to violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Is it
perfectly
On 03/15/2014 03:53 PM, Juha Heljoranta wrote:
I am not able to get the gpg to verify a signature.
Any advice how to fix this?
Or could the key 9C973C92 be invalid/broken?
$ mkdir -m 700 newgnupg
$ echo foo zinc-0.2.0.jar
$ wget
On Mar 15, 2014, at 3:53 PM, Juha Heljoranta juha.heljora...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
I am not able to get the gpg to verify a signature.
Any advice how to fix this?
Or could the key 9C973C92 be invalid/broken?
The key may be fine, but the signature is invalid. DSA keys specify how many
bits
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Hauke Laging mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de
wrote:
Hello,
I may have found a locale bug in 1.4.12. I am aware that this is not the
current version but I cannot easily install 1.4.16 now. 1.4.12 is the
version in Knoppix 7.2.
I have problems with non-ASCII
On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net
wrote:
On 03/15/2014 03:53 PM, Juha Heljoranta wrote:
I am not able to get the gpg to verify a signature.
Any advice how to fix this?
Or could the key 9C973C92 be invalid/broken?
$ mkdir -m 700 newgnupg
$ echo
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:39, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
So gpg's behavior seems to be non-uniform here. That said, i'd love to
As required by FIPS-186-3, 4.2:
This Standard specifies the following choices for the pair L and N
(the bit lengths of p and q, respectively):
L = 1024, N
That is an odd comparison. What does a statement about a fundamental
law of physics which you can't change have to do with a statement
about what you are doing, where you are perfectly free to do something
else than you say?
Try some variations.
I deny that I've ever been to Vienna; is it
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:39, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
So gpg's behavior seems to be non-uniform here. That said, i'd love to
be able to tell gpg to ignore or explicitly reject signatures made by
strong keys with MD5 digests.
There is a new option in master:
--allow-weak-digest-algos
Am 17.03.2014 17:54, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
That is an odd comparison. What does a statement about a fundamental
law of physics which you can't change have to do with a statement
about what you are doing, where you are perfectly free to do something
else than you say?
Try some
On Monday, March 17, 2014 10:39:58 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Perhaps the folks who publish zinc need to --enable-dsa2, or to remove
any mistaken digest-algo sha1 from their signing routines? You could
point them at this thread in the gnupg-users archives if you think it
would be useful.
11 matches
Mail list logo