Il 03/05/2014 01:10, Daniel Kahn Gillmor ha scritto:
Having such an assertion cryptographically bound to the OpenPGP
certificate in parseable form implies in some sense that you think a
mechanical process (e.g. WoT calculated validity) should be able to make
use of it. But how would that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 03.05.2014 05:01, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
And regardless of whether it's a good practice or a bad one, I've
worked in businesses that have done exactly this -- so it's a
real-world example that demonstrates the occasional need for a
third
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 8:54 AM, NdK ndk.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 03/05/2014 01:10, Daniel Kahn Gillmor ha scritto:
Having such an assertion cryptographically bound to the OpenPGP
certificate in parseable form implies in some sense that you think a
mechanical process (e.g. WoT calculated
Personally, I would prefer not to discriminate against black people,
for reasons that have already been expressed on the list. But if
there's a corporate policy that says I have to, then that's the way
you play the game.
In which case, the proper response is to say I quit. That's a simple
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:15:40 +0200
Peter Lebbing pe...@digitalbrains.com wrote:
On 25/04/14 00:19, Gabriel Niebler wrote:
And Authenticity is an equally clear and additionally _intuitive_
descriptive name for the same simple, mechanistic concept.
Validity naturally lends itself to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 3 May 2014 at 2:08:35 AM, in
mid:20140502200835.2cb51...@bigbox.christie.dr,
gn...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
However, after adding multiple uids and emailing an
encrypted test message from the new UID
(w...@example.com), I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 3 May 2014 17:28:56 +0100
MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net wrote:
Letters of
introduction are not something one encounters much in
the modern world one but tying the process to a
physical analogue might make things easier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 3 May 2014 at 7:56:55 PM, in
mid:20140503195655.5c2df...@cerberus.dumain.com, William Hay wrote:
In most cases this would have the opposite answer to
the second question. It might make things simpler to
combine them in
Am Sa 03.05.2014, 22:33:14 schrieb MFPA:
GnuPG only prompts you to pick a certification level if you enable the
--ask-cert-level option, which is disabled by default. As far as I
know, the level doesn't affect WoT calculations.
Then let's extend your knowlege: --min-cert-level
It's even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 3 May 2014 at 10:47:22 PM, in
mid:2123757.Pxcbtkot8g@inno, Hauke Laging wrote:
Then let's extend your knowlege: --min-cert-level
It's even explained in dkg's article which you point
to.
It says (users can change this cutoff
10 matches
Mail list logo
